Re: guile-gtk

2004-06-21 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > > >> As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason; > >> It used to work. > > > > Ok. We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS. > > Dirk has fixed it. Most looks ok now apart from: > > + guile -s ../src/libgnom

Re: guile-gtk

2004-06-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: >> As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason; >> It used to work. > > Ok. We'll just `wait' for Dirk Herrman do fix CVS. Dirk has fixed it. Most looks ok now apart from: + guile -s ../src/libgnomecanvas/examples/canvas.scm (gnome gtk): [glib

Re: guile-gtk

2004-06-21 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Andreas Rottmann writes: > I've some talking with Rob Browning about that; I've taken over > maintainership of G-Wrap and will release a 1.9.0 pretty soon > now. I'll then package the new G-Wrap for Debian (which will coexist > with the old g-wrap packages). Great, this is very good news! > I th

Re: guile-gtk

2004-06-20 Thread Andreas Rottmann
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Rottmann writes: > >> The bindings of GTK+ 2 are maintained, but there are no tarballs as >> of yet. You can grab it via Arch, however. > > I've added very experimental gnome canvas output to LilyPond CVS, > using TLA guile-gnome. This is of

Re: guile-gtk

2004-05-28 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Andreas Rottmann writes: > The bindings of GTK+ 2 are maintained, but there are no tarballs as > of yet. You can grab it via Arch, however. I've added very experimental gnome canvas output to LilyPond CVS, using TLA guile-gnome. This is of course, very hacker only. Do you/we have a vague planni