Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Andreas Rottmann writes: > >> The bindings of GTK+ 2 are maintained, but there are no tarballs as >> of yet. You can grab it via Arch, however. > > I've added very experimental gnome canvas output to LilyPond CVS, > using TLA guile-gnome. This is of course, very hacker only. > > Do you/we have a vague planning/wish-date for: > > 1. hijacking g-wrap and replacing it by g-wrap-tng (when could this > replace g-wrap 1.x in Debian/unstable, eg). > I've some talking with Rob Browning about that; I've taken over maintainership of G-Wrap and will release a 1.9.0 pretty soon now. I'll then package the new G-Wrap for Debian (which will coexist with the old g-wrap packages).
> 2. releasing guile-gnome2 0.99 tarballs (or, a Debian package) > I think after we have a G-Wrap 1.9.0 release, we can release tarballs of Guile-GNOME soonish. I think we should follow suite with the of the platform bindings and have 2.7.x release numbers. As soon as we have tarballs out (and g-wrap 1.9 is packaged), I can go ahead and work to close the now already long-standing ITP on guile-gobject. > Also, > > 3. my first tries with g-wrap--tng and guile-gnome did not work with > Guile CVS, are there known issues, is anyone working on this? > As Guile CVS seems to be a bit fucked up ATM, this might be a reason; It used to work. > What are the main obstacles for 1,2,3, where can I help best? > I think testing and new code using the bindings would be nice. Other than that, I can't think of something ATM. Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 Say NO to Software Patents! -- http://petition.eurolinux.org/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
