On Thursday 03 June 2004 13.14, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> > Sounds good. And before doing anything, please think through all
> > dependencies twice.
>
> That's a good piece of advice. In fact I have to sit down one day and
> double check this.
>
> > We don't want to need any dummy transition packages e
* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Let Y even, Z odd.
> 1. packages lilypondX.Y contain stable versions of lilypond.
> 2. package lilypond-stable (or just lilypond) depends on the latest
> lilypondX.Y package.
> 3. package lilypond-unstable contains the latest unstable version.
> (this w
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 18.50, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> * Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I have 2 suggestions here (which are more food for thought than
> > opinions): 1. How about adding two metapackages 'lilypond-stable' and
> > 'lilypond-unstable' (or whatever the names would be), dep
* Erik Sandberg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I have 2 suggestions here (which are more food for thought than opinions):
> 1. How about adding two metapackages 'lilypond-stable' and
> 'lilypond-unstable' (or whatever the names would be), depending on the
latest
> lilypondX.Y package? This would el
On Friday 28 May 2004 12.35, Pedro Kroger wrote:
> * Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I don't know about the package naming conventions in Debian, but
> > wouldn't it be better to use a name like lilypond (without version
> > number) for the stable versions and lilypond-unstable (or wh
* Jan Nieuwenhuizen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You should have makeinfo 4.7, emacs CVS to see them, and info/pictures
> installed as:
so emacs is the reason I was unable to see the pictures (I have
21.3). I'm going to compile it from cvs (oh boy! I hope I don't have
to make unofficial packages o
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I don't know about the package naming conventions in Debian, but
> wouldn't it be better to use a name like lilypond (without version
> number) for the stable versions and lilypond-unstable (or whatever)
> for the unstable versions. Otherwise, you will
Pedro Kroger writes:
> As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package.
Great!
[snip]
> *I still don't have pictures in my info files, but I don't know if the
> problem is in my system, emacs, texinfo, lilypond, or debian. I have
> to dig further. This is the major thing missing in m
Pedro Kroger wrote:
Hi folks,
[it's a long email, sorry]
As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package. It's based
on the previous work by Fok but I deleted the unnecessary stuff (like
specific code for lily 1.3 and 1.7 for example) and made it
"independent" of the stable one, i.e., y
Hi folks,
[it's a long email, sorry]
As you know I started a new "branch" in the debian package. It's based
on the previous work by Fok but I deleted the unnecessary stuff (like
specific code for lily 1.3 and 1.7 for example) and made it
"independent" of the stable one, i.e., you can have both in
10 matches
Mail list logo
