On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:20:40PM +, James Lowe wrote:
>
> I would give you more threads but gmane is hanging - does anyone
> know if there is another 'site' I can look up dev/bug/user
> archives and search?
Gee, it would sure be useful if our "contacts" page on the website
gave a few differ
Hello,
From: Graham Percival [gra...@percival-music.ca]
Sent: 05 July 2011 20:24
To: James Lowe
Cc: Jonathan Kulp; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: compiling documentation
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 03:20:40PM +, James Lowe wrote:
>
> I would gi
Hi James
Try http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/ etc
Trevor
- Original Message -
From: "James Lowe"
To: "Jonathan Kulp"
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: compiling documentation
Hello,
)-Original Message-
2011/7/5 James Lowe
> I would give you more threads but gmane is hanging - does anyone know if
> there is another 'site' I can look up dev/bug/user archives and search?
>
>
all the links are here:
http://lilypond.org/contact.html
___
lilypond-devel mail
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> My build env is fine, or at least it has been for more than a year.
>> The doc-compile problem only started a couple of weeks ago. I have
>> lilydev installed on another hard drive. Maybe I'll pop it in and try
>> it out. I'd rather not both
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: Jonathan Kulp [mailto:jonlancek...@gmail.com]
)Sent: 05 July 2011 15:41
)To: James Lowe
)Cc: Graham Percival; lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: compiling documentation
)
)On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Jonathan Kulp
) wrote:
)>> My build env i
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>>
>> However ./autogen.sh and/or ./configure should report any missing/old/wrong
>> dependencies. So do you get anything back from them (you will probably get
>> something about a 'recommended' Fontforge version as I do - the lilydev
>> vers
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 4:58 AM, James Lowe wrote:
> )I'm running Linux Mint Debian Edition, which is based on Debian Testing
> )branch. Not sure what consequences that might have for this situation. I
> )just run "apt-get build-dep lilypond" when setting up build env. I also
> )install "gnome-comm
Hello,
)-Original Message-
)From: lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org
)[mailto:lilypond-devel-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On
)Behalf Of Jonathan Kulp
)Sent: 03 July 2011 16:35
)To: Graham Percival
)Cc: lilypond-devel@gnu.org
)Subject: Re: compiling
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
> Well, it means that (from our standpoint) you have a completely
> unknown development environment. It's obviously something that we
> want to fix, but we're back at square one.
>
> Go through the normal steps:
> 1. disbelief
> 2. barganin
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:34:47AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I'm running Linux Mint Debian Edition, which is based on Debian
> Testing branch. Not sure what consequences that might have for this
> situation. I just run "apt-get build-dep lilypond" when setting up
> build env. I also install "gn
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:18:56AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > My goodness. I assume this is with lilydev? Can you reproduce it
>> > on the command-line?
>>
>> Umm. N
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 10:18:56AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
> >
> > My goodness. I assume this is with lilydev? Can you reproduce it
> > on the command-line?
>
> Umm. Not sure what lilydev is exactly. Is that the ubuntu distro I
> ma
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Graham Percival
wrote:
>
>> Here's the last bit of my doc-build attempt's output. Segfault occurs
>> on tablature-string-tunings.ly:
>
> My goodness. I assume this is with lilydev? Can you reproduce it
> on the command-line?
Umm. Not sure what lilydev is exactly.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 07:48:36AM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> >
> > But the lilypond log file might give further information on the cause of the
> > failure.
If it fails on the command-line, then the command-line will
contain any information
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>
> But the lilypond log file might give further information on the cause of the
> failure.
>
Here's the last bit of my doc-build attempt's output. Segfault occurs
on tablature-string-tunings.ly:
[/home/jon/lilypond/out/share/lilypond/current
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Federico Bruni" ;
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: compiling documentation
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:18:46PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
If you're running LilyDe
Il giorno dom, 03/07/2011 alle 12.56 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:15:12PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > It worked at second try:
> >
> > But it failed on the first try. That is important to know.
> >
> > Could you run it again with --verbose ? if it work
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:15:12PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote:
> > It worked at second try:
>
> But it failed on the first try. That is important to know.
>
> Could you run it again with --verbose ? if it works, then try
> running it a few times until it fails. We need the output of a
> fail
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:18:46PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> If you're running LilyDev, then there's a Finder tool under Places
> (Search for files).
That's beside the point. This is no longer a build system issue.
This is a lilypond binary which occasionally segfaults. It's a
plain old Critic
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Graham Percival" ;
Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: compiling documentation
Il giorno dom, 03/07/2011 alle 11.49 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
There's also
On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 12:27:54PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 19.14 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > I'm confused. Let's all stop for the moment.
I'm still confused.
> > 2. does git master work? To test this, do:
> > 2a. git pull
> > 2b. rm -rf build
Il giorno dom, 03/07/2011 alle 11.49 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
> There's also strangeness with this output. The "translation" version
> is
> running a different version of Lilypond - it's using 2.15.0 whereas
> the
> master version is running 2.15.4.
>
because my local copy is not up-to-d
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
2g. out/bin/lilypond ../input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
Run that command a few times, in case it's just an occasional
problem.
It worked at second try:
fede@fede-laptop:~/lilypond-master/build$
out/bin/lilypond ../input/regression
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 19.14 +0100, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> > fede@fede-laptop:~/lilypond-git/build$
> > out/bin/lilypond ../input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
> > GNU LilyPond 2.15.0
>
> I'm confused. Let's all st
2011/7/2 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> fede@fede-laptop:~/lilypond-git/build$
>> out/bin/lilypond ../input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
>> GNU LilyPond 2.15.0
>
> I'm confused. Let's all stop for the moment.
>
> 1. as far as I understand,
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 07:30:03PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> fede@fede-laptop:~/lilypond-git/build$
> out/bin/lilypond ../input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
> GNU LilyPond 2.15.0
I'm confused. Let's all stop for the moment.
1. as far as I understand, you see occasional problems when
atte
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 18.10 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
> See your output above - it's 2.15.4. 2.15.0 is your installed
> version.
>
no, 2.15.0 is not installed (it's not in my path)
Well, reading terminal output in an email is not easy
> >From your build directory run
>
> /out/bin
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Francisco Vila" ;
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 6:00 PM
Subject: Re: compiling documentation
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 17.41 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
- Original Messag
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 17.41 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Federico Bruni"
> To: "Phil Holmes"
> Cc: "Francisco Vila" ;
> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 5:33 PM
> Subject: Re: compiling documentatio
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Francisco Vila" ;
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: compiling documentation
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 16.31 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
Well - it looks as
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 16.31 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:
> Well - it looks as if it's failing trying to run lilypond on
> /input/regression/midi/key-initial.ly
>
> I can offer 2 suggestions. Instead of make distclean, simply delete
> your
> build directory and then recreate it using
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To: "Francisco Vila"
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: compiling documentation
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 13.12 +0200, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
As Phil pointed out, you must compile lilypo
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 05:23:05PM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Yes, you are right: I forgot to run 'make' before 'make doc'.
> But I still can't compile. Here's the list of commands I've used right
> now:
Those commands are sufficient.
> make distclean
That said, I would not recommend distcl
Il giorno sab, 02/07/2011 alle 13.12 +0200, Francisco Vila ha scritto:
> As Phil pointed out, you must compile lilypond first. 'Make doc'
> right after 'make distclean' won't work. First 'make', then 'make
> doc'.
>
Yes, you are right: I forgot to run 'make' before 'make doc'.
But I still can't
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 01:35:32PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/7/2 Graham Percival :
> > There's certainly nothing in his build log that suggests that he
> > failed to run "make". It looks like a normal doc build failure to
> > me.
>
> I could have misread the first error line, which read
2011/7/2 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 01:12:26PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
>> 2011/7/2 Graham Percival :
>> > That is irrelevant. The build system uses its own lilypond.
>>
>> As Phil pointed out, you must compile lilypond first. 'Make doc'
>> right after 'make distclean' won't
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 01:12:26PM +0200, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2011/7/2 Graham Percival :
> > That is irrelevant. The build system uses its own lilypond.
>
> As Phil pointed out, you must compile lilypond first. 'Make doc'
> right after 'make distclean' won't work. First 'make', then 'make
>
2011/7/2 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:53:03AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> Also, I'm pretty confused about the lilypond version used when
>> compiling.
>> Currently I have 2.14.1 (default) and 2.12.3 in my path:
>
> That is irrelevant. The build system uses its own lilypond.
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 11:53:03AM +0200, Federico Bruni wrote:
> Also, I'm pretty confused about the lilypond version used when
> compiling.
> Currently I have 2.14.1 (default) and 2.12.3 in my path:
That is irrelevant. The build system uses its own lilypond.
> "/home/fede/lilypond-git/build/ou
- Original Message -
From: "Federico Bruni"
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 10:53 AM
Subject: compiling documentation
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the documentation in order to see if the snippets
in the Templates chapter of LM are correctly translated in italian.
[
Hi,
I'm trying to compile the documentation in order to see if the snippets
in the Templates chapter of LM are correctly translated in italian.
Some information:
- I'm on the translation branch
- I couldn't compile using the usual configuration, i.e. without the
build/ firectory
- so I run `make
42 matches
Mail list logo
