On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> I think it would be better to work on other things right now. :-)
>> Unless someone else jumps in and explains exactly how event classes
>> work, that is.
>>
>> I'll put it on my TODO list. The IR really needs to
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> I think it would be better to work on other things right now. :-)
> Unless someone else jumps in and explains exactly how event classes
> work, that is.
>
> I'll put it on my TODO list. The IR really needs to be cleaned up wrt
> StreamEvents and related items.
Right no
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> There are a lot of things to clean up in the Internals Reference; the
>> question is where to start?
>>
>> For example, the IR should separate "events" from "music expressions",
>> but right now everything is bundled
Patrick McCarty wrote:
> There are a lot of things to clean up in the Internals Reference; the
> question is where to start?
>
> For example, the IR should separate "events" from "music expressions",
> but right now everything is bundled together. All of those other
> C++-only events (RemoveConte
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Mark Polesky wrote:
>
> I noticed this thread from two years ago:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-07/msg00020.html
>
> Apparently, StreamEvent should be renamed stream-event. I'm happy to do
> that, but is it really as simple as changing thes
I noticed this thread from two years ago:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2007-07/msg00020.html
Apparently, StreamEvent should be renamed stream-event. I'm happy to do
that, but is it really as simple as changing these 2 lines (lines 12-13)
in scm/define-event-classes.scm? Or is
