On 11-03-10 02:56 AM, John Mandereau wrote:
How much interest is there in having a very general picture (possibly
without quoting directly the makefiles) about the stepmake layer (i.e.
makefiles build, recursive make (both inside same directory and in
dubdirectories)), about the flaws (and desire
Il giorno gio, 10/03/2011 alle 12.25 +, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> IMO
>
> $(outdir)/%.gif: %.xpm
> xpmtoppm $< | ppmtogif > $@
>
> counts as "difficult".
Right, it's not complicated but as you pointed out it's cryptic.
> So does
>
> ls $(OUT)/$$l/*.html | xargs
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:56:01AM +0100, John Mandereau wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 04/03/2011 alle 12.16 +, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> > There is widespread dissatisfaction with our current build system.
> > Replacing it is estimated to take at least 200 hours, but that's a
> > total shot in t
Il giorno ven, 04/03/2011 alle 12.16 +, Graham Percival ha scritto:
> There is widespread dissatisfaction with our current build system.
> Replacing it is estimated to take at least 200 hours, but that's a
> total shot in the dark. However, a few people have expressed interest
> in working on
2011/3/5 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:37:04PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
>> 2011/3/4 Graham Percival :
>> > PS I'm fairly certain that at the moment, all "needs_work" issues
>> > do not have any "more recent" drafts that you need to look at.
>>
>> Doesn't http://code.google.com/p/l
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:37:04PM +0100, Jan Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/3/4 Graham Percival :
> > PS I'm fairly certain that at the moment, all "needs_work" issues
> > do not have any "more recent" drafts that you need to look at.
>
> Doesn't http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1541
> h
: build system work
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>
> > On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >> On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> >>
> >>
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Vila"
To: "Graham Percival"
Cc: "Lily devel" ; "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
2011/3/4 Graham Percival :
> To that end, I've just added a new C
2011/3/4 Graham Percival :
> PS I'm fairly certain that at the moment, all "needs_work" issues
> do not have any "more recent" drafts that you need to look at.
Doesn't http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1541
have a new draft? (with fixed indentation)
http://codereview.appspot.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Carl Sorensen"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 8:05 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbe
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 10:23:36PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
> Actually, and before I go stepping on toes in all directions, I
> wouldn't mind some guidance on a couple of things, please. CG 12.2
> Meisters describes the Frog Meister as being responsible for code
> patches from (relatively) ine
On 11-03-04 02:09 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:43:19PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
On 11-03-04 01:05 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling
For the sake of keeping an eye on the issues list, looking for
"patc
On 3/4/11 1:05 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>>
>>> On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>
> [subject: wiki or not?]
>
>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 01:43:19PM -0700, Colin Campbell wrote:
> On 11-03-04 01:05 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
> >http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/contributor/patch-handling
> >
> For the sake of keeping an eye on the issues list, looking for
> "patch-review" then applying the test as li
On 11-03-04 01:05 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Oh, there _is_ one way: if more people took on more of my current
duties, I'd have more time left in my 10 hours, and could thus
spend more time helping this process. The biggest/easiest time
sink for me right now is checking and bestowing Patch-revi
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>
> > On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> >> On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> >>
[subject: wiki or not?]
> >>> I'm the noob here, so I'll defer to greater wisdom.
On 3/4/11 11:09 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>> On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
>>
>>> I'm the noob here, so I'll defer to greater wisdom. A couple of
>>> thoughts do occur, though: using the CG to collect discoveries, insights
>>> etc. h
On 11-03-04 10:54 AM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
On 11-03-04 05:55 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50
On 3/4/11 10:31 AM, "Colin Campbell" wrote:
> On 11-03-04 05:55 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
>> - Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
>>
>> To: "Phil Holmes"
>> Cc: "Lily devel"
>> Sent: Friday, March 04, 20
On 11-03-04 09:23 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/3/4 Graham Percival:
To that end, I've just added a new CG 12 Build system notes. The goal
is to have a "wiki-like" dump of whatever info we suspect about the
build system.
Does that include the _doc_ build system?
I'll take the liberty of rep
On 11-03-04 05:55 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'm wondering whether w
2011/3/4 Graham Percival :
> To that end, I've just added a new CG 12 Build system notes. The goal
> is to have a "wiki-like" dump of whatever info we suspect about the
> build system.
Does that include the _doc_ build system?
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc: "Lily devel"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: build system work
On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes wrote:
I'm wondering whether we should actually start with a real Wiki -
On 3/4/11, Phil Holmes wrote:
> I'm wondering whether we should actually start with a real Wiki - like the
> one used for the regtests. Doing this would mean that any work done would
> be immediately visible, rather than having to pull git and make docs, which
> would save me oodles of time (a te
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "Lily devel"
Cc: "Phil Holmes"
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2011 12:16 PM
Subject: build system work
There is widespread dissatisfaction with our current build system.
Replacing it is estimated to take at
There is widespread dissatisfaction with our current build system.
Replacing it is estimated to take at least 200 hours, but that's a
total shot in the dark. However, a few people have expressed interest
in working on this.
IMO, such a project should begin by figuring out what the current
build s
26 matches
Mail list logo
