Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-17 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 13.03.2013 17:05, schrieb Janek Warchoł: Hi Marc&all, On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Marc Hohl wrote: make sure you sit comfortable and have a nice cup of coffee, tea or whatever around... these words actually reminded me that i had a tea waiting, and thanks to you it didn't get totall

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread Janek Warchoł
Hi Marc&all, On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Marc Hohl wrote: > make > sure you sit comfortable and have a nice cup of coffee, tea or whatever > around... these words actually reminded me that i had a tea waiting, and thanks to you it didn't get totally cold before i drank it :) > a) replace

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread David Kastrup
Joram Berger writes: > Hi, > > I would like to add some thoughts to that: > > 1.) What I use (and what is probably the most frequent case) are: > a) \repeat {} and \alternative { {} {} } % repeats > b) \bar "||" % new section \divisio > c) \bar "|." % end of staff \finis > The first is syn

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread Joram Berger
Hi, I would like to add some thoughts to that: 1.) What I use (and what is probably the most frequent case) are: a) \repeat {} and \alternative { {} {} } % repeats b) \bar "||" % new section c) \bar "|." % end of staff The first is syntactical the others are bar lines. Syntactical elements

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 13.03.2013 12:18, schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: Am 13.03.2013 10:27, schrieb David Kastrup: One reason I am skeptical about this particular suggestion is that more often than not (like the typical multi-stanza pop song with a separate ending), D.S.a.C is _intertwined_ with

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread David Kastrup
Marc Hohl writes: > Am 13.03.2013 10:27, schrieb David Kastrup: > >>One reason I am skeptical about this >> particular suggestion is that more often than not (like the typical >> multi-stanza pop song with a separate ending), D.S.a.C is _intertwined_ >> with a repeat volta. > LilyPond already

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 13.03.2013 10:27, schrieb David Kastrup: Marc Hohl writes: Hello list, after some discussions on -user (partly emotional - sorry for that!) I promised to think about improving the bar line interface. Well, hereare some preliminary results. The mail got a bit long, so make sure you sit comf

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread David Kastrup
Marc Hohl writes: > Hello list, > > after some discussions on -user (partly emotional - sorry for that!) > I promised to think about improving the bar line interface. Well, > hereare some preliminary results. The mail got a bit long, so make > sure you sit comfortable and have a nice cup of coffe

Re: bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread Marc Hohl
Am 13.03.2013 10:09, schrieb Marc Hohl: [...] a) replace the current mechanism by a command (define-bar-line ( :prebreak :postbreak :span-bar :prebreak-span :postbreak-span )) where :prebreak, :postbreak, :spanbar, :prebreak-span and :postbreak-span arguments are optional,and we define (in

bar line interface / repat structure considerations

2013-03-13 Thread Marc Hohl
Hello list, after some discussions on -user (partly emotional - sorry for that!) I promised to think about improving the bar line interface. Well, hereare some preliminary results. The mail got a bit long, so make sure you sit comfortable and have a nice cup of coffee, tea or whatever around...