Hi all,
On Sun, 2024-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> Looking at the bigger picture, we released LilyPond 2.22.0 in early
> 2021 (it slipped from late 2020) and version 2.24.0 in late 2022. That
> said, I'm not sure there is already "enough" to plan for 2.26.0 and
> maybe we should no
On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 22:30 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > it's been 7 months since the last stable (bugfix) release, LilyPond
> > 2.24.3. Today I went through the list of all (smaller) merge requests
> > and marked those
On Tue, 2024-07-09 at 14:22 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote:
> Please have a look at https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/issues/6726
> A showstopper for next stable?
Thanks for the heads-up. As far as I can tell, and from local testing,
this only affects the current master / unstable releases. So ye
Am So., 16. Juni 2024 um 22:24 Uhr schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld via
Discussions on LilyPond development :
>
> Hi all,
>
> it's been 7 months since the last stable (bugfix) release, LilyPond
> 2.24.3. Today I went through the list of all (smaller) merge requests
> and marked those that we might want to ap
> I think I tend towards skipping all of them for stable/2.24 at the
> current state.
OK.
Werner
> The tentative plan would be to release 2.25.18 next weekend and then
> 2.24.4 the week after, maybe again with binaries produced on
> Wednesday or Thursday (to be seen).
+1
Werner
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 19:37 +, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > > I also suggest !2359.
> >
> > So far I didn't backport any documentation improvements to
> > stable/2.24. Is there anything special about this one?
>
> I think these index entries complete the list of essential syntax
> elements in t
On Sun, 2024-06-16 at 22:24 +0200, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it's been 7 months since the last stable (bugfix) release, LilyPond
> 2.24.3. Today I went through the list of all (smaller) merge requests
> and marked those that we might want to apply to the stable/2.24 branch
> with the Bac
>> I also suggest !2359.
>
> So far I didn't backport any documentation improvements to
> stable/2.24. Is there anything special about this one?
I think these index entries complete the list of essential syntax
elements in the NR.
Werner
On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 03:16 +, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> > [...] we could think about having LilyPond 2.24.4 in early / mid
> > July. What do you think?
>
> +1
>
> I also suggest !2359.
So far I didn't backport any documentation improvements to stable/2.24.
Is there anything special about thi
> [...] we could think about having LilyPond 2.24.4 in early / mid
> July. What do you think?
+1
I also suggest !2359.
Werner
Hi all,
it's been 7 months since the last stable (bugfix) release, LilyPond
2.24.3. Today I went through the list of all (smaller) merge requests
and marked those that we might want to apply to the stable/2.24 branch
with the Backport label:
https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests?st
12 matches
Mail list logo