On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
> My suggestion - unless there are _real_ problems with my patch (and
> there aren't) let's start focussing on other shitty bits of
> documentation now that I've fixed this shitty element of the NR.
...
ok. By my "working rule" (he who
On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 02:49:21PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:29 PM
>
> > I think that most of these bad presentations are due to the fact that
> > proofreading is done with the HTML version. We should then advocate
> > that the "fi
Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote Saturday, July 14, 2012 1:29 PM
> I think that most of these bad presentations are due to the fact that
> proofreading is done with the HTML version. We should then advocate
> that the "final draft" before pushing a patch that touches any part of
> the documentat
Le 13/07/2012 10:23, Phil Holmes disait :
- Original Message - From: "Graham Percival"
Anyway, my current understanding is that there are three realistic
options:
1)
--- linewidth --
fromsome kind of
emergency-stretch-tweak
--- linewidth --
2)
manua
- Original Message -
From: "Graham Percival"
To: "David Kastrup"
Cc:
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2012 12:40 AM
Subject: Re: Texinfo help, please
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:45:24PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Graham Percival writes:
> Hmm. So there
Graham Percival writes:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:01:52AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Sorry, I should have specified "absolutely no way to get ---
>> > without any mixing of content and layout commands". I think we
>> > should minimize any layout-specific
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:01:52AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Sorry, I should have specified "absolutely no way to get ---
> > without any mixing of content and layout commands". I think we
> > should minimize any layout-specific commands in our docs.
>
> It's n
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:45:24PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>
>> > Hmm. So there's absolutely no way to get
>> >
>> > --- linewidth --
>> > from some kind of
>> > emergency-stretch-tweak
>> > --- linewidth --
>> >
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:45:24PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Hmm. So there's absolutely no way to get
> >
> > --- linewidth --
> > from some kind of
> > emergency-stretch-tweak
> > --- linewidth --
> >
> > ? that's a shame.
>
> If you w
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:28:35PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> More like
>>
>> --- linewidth --
>> Thisisaparagraph
>> which has a really long
>> word and has benefitted
>> from some kind of
>> emergency-stretch-tweak
>> w
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:28:35PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> More like
>
> --- linewidth --
> Thisisaparagraph
> which has a really long
> word and has benefitted
> from some kind of
> emergency-stretch-tweak
> which isn't IMO exactly what
> we wa
Janek Warchoł writes:
> From what i understand (based on David's description) the result in
> second case would rather be
>
> --- linewidth --
> This is a paragraph which
> has a really long word and
> has benefitted from some
> kind of
> emergency-stretc
>From what i understand (based on David's description) the result in
second case would rather be
--- linewidth --
This is a paragraph which
has a really long word and
has benefitted from some
kind of
emergency-stretch-tweak
which isn't IMO exactly what
we
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:45:49PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>
> > Sure. So we're asking if TeX can be tweaked to consider
> > additional solutions. (namely, "always add a line-break before
> > anything with an overfull hbox, regardless of what that makes the
> > res
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Graham Percival writes:
>>> Sure. So we're asking if TeX can be tweaked to consider
>>> additional solutions. (namely, "always add a line-break before
>>> anything with an overfull hbox, regardless of what that m
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 9:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival writes:
>> Sure. So we're asking if TeX can be tweaked to consider
>> additional solutions. (namely, "always add a line-break before
>> anything with an overfull hbox, regardless of what that makes the
>> rest of that parag
Graham Percival writes:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:50:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Janek Warchoł writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>> >> > It should wrap between the words "the file" and the filename.
>
> +1
>
>> >
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 03:50:21PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Janek Warchoł writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >> "Phil Holmes" writes:
> >> > It should wrap between the words "the file" and the filename.
+1
> > It would probably be less ugly that an
Janek Warchoł writes:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>> > It should wrap between the words "the file" and the filename.
>>
>> Obviously not enough stretchability for that to fit. You can try
>>
>> @tex
>> \global\emergencystretch=5in
>> @end
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> "Phil Holmes" writes:
> > It should wrap between the words "the file" and the filename.
>
> Obviously not enough stretchability for that to fit. You can try
>
> @tex
> \global\emergencystretch=5in
> @end tex
>
> and see where this gets yo
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To: "Phil Holmes"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: Texinfo help, please
"Phil Holmes" writes:
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, Jul
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Kastrup"
> To:
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:22 PM
> Subject: Re: Texinfo help, please
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" writes:
>>
>>> I'm doing a little
- Original Message -
From: "David Kastrup"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: Texinfo help, please
"Phil Holmes" writes:
I'm doing a little project to get rid of all the black bars on the
right side of the PDF of the NR - these indi
"Phil Holmes" writes:
> I'm doing a little project to get rid of all the black bars on the
> right side of the PDF of the NR - these indicate material that is too
> wide to be properly accommodated on the page. One of the things that
> causes this is text like:
>
> Fret diagrams for the ukulele
I'm doing a little project to get rid of all the black bars on the right
side of the PDF of the NR - these indicate material that is too wide to be
properly accommodated on the page. One of the things that causes this is
text like:
Fret diagrams for the ukulele are contained in the file
@file
25 matches
Mail list logo
