On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:45:24PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes:
>
> > Hmm. So there's absolutely no way to get
> >
> > ----------- linewidth ------
> > from some kind of
> > emergency-stretch-tweak
> > ----------- linewidth ------
> >
> > ? that's a shame.
>
> If you want a non-stretching break-opportunity before some construct,
Sorry, I should have specified "absolutely no way to get ---
without any mixing of content and layout commands". I think we
should minimize any layout-specific commands in our docs.
I've spent a few minutes here and there looking at
tex.stackexchange.com and doing google searches, and I feel a bit
let down. The answers are consistently "you can manually add a
line-break, you can change the hyphenation with \sloppy, or you
can reword your sentences". It's the last that really bugs me.
:(
Anyway, my current understanding is that there are three realistic
options:
1)
----------- linewidth ------
from some kind of
emergency-stretch-tweak
----------- linewidth ------
2)
manually insert a @* before every @file{} in the docs which would
produce an overfull hbox, to force a linebreak.
(I reject the option of breaking within a filename)
3)
manually reword any sentence including a @file{} which would
produce an overfull hbox.
Phil's patch currently does #2 and #3. I am not fond of those
options, since it means that we need to take extra care when
writing or editing docs. I would rather see #1.
Thoughts, objections?
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
