Sounds good. I'll read through NR 1.5 and 1.6 next week.
Andrew
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:02:21PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
>> I'd learn a lot f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 schrieb Patrick McCarty:
> My latest doc changes were pushed 27 hours, but I can't see the
> changes on your server
Ah, yes, the Spanish docs had one spurious @end itemize, where the list was
moved to a different secti
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:35:58PM +0200, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote:
>
> While I'm not in a position to answer that particular question, I still want
> to point out that the docs on http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/ are
> automatically built from the latest git master every morning (CEST), so these
Carl D. Sorensen Friday, September 12, 2008 9:13 PM
On 9/12/08 2:10 PM, "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 9:02 PM
I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen:
> Why does a reviewer need to pull source files from git? Can't (shouldn't)
> the reviewer do the final review on the docs themselves?
While I'm not in a position to answer that particular ques
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:02:21PM -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
> I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
> tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
> LilyPond binaries over br
On 9/12/08 2:10 PM, "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 9:02 PM
>
>
>> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
>> I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
>> tell if they make sense to
Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 9:02 PM
I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
LilyPond binaries over breakfast.
OK, th
I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
LilyPond binaries over breakfast.
Andrew
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL
Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 8:27 PM
Are you up for more doc work?
Trevor
Yes, I'm up for more. I'm a slow doc writer, but I'm willing. :)
Great! What sort of work would you like? There are
a few sections that still need fairly major revision
and editing; there are some t
> Are you up for more doc work?
>
> Trevor
Yes, I'm up for more. I'm a slow doc writer, but I'm willing. :)
Also, I did go through the "Winds" section during GDP and got it all
cleaned up except the fingerings section, so you can change the "not
yet started" label. I expect to have something to a
Doc Team
I've been fiddling with the Documentation Coordination page that John set up
at
http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Documentation_coordination
It looks like it will be useful, but there is more to do yet. Unfortunately
I shall be away for a week from tomorrow, almost
Vila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
"Jonathan Kulp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Carl D. Sorensen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "John Mandereau"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "ralph Palmer" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Keyboards is done, as far as I can see.
Andrew
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Patrick McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:43:53PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>> It is about 80% completed and ready for the first
>> draft.
>
> Just to clarify, I should have said:
>
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:43:53PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>
> It is about 80% completed and ready for the first
> draft.
Just to clarify, I should have said:
It is about 80% completed. Then it will be ready for the first draft.
Thanks,
Patrick
__
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:58:26AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> NR 1:
> Expressive: ready for indexing 6 Aug - Ralph?
Ralph, can you double check that there are not duplicate index entries
in this section? I remember adding some in @predefined, but then also
added some in the main docs withi
John Mandereau wrote Wednesday, September 10, 2008 5:49 PM
On 2008/09/10 10:58 +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
I'd like to establish the present status of the 2.11 docs.
Could you all please confirm, update or extend the information below,
which
covers the sections which I believe are currentl
2008/9/10 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> NR 1:
> Text: Valentin?
I'd say 70% done. I've felt a bit discouraged for the past couple of
weeks (busy times...) but I certainly haven't forgotten it.
Cheers,
Valentin
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
On 2008/09/10 10:58 +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> I'd like to establish the present status of the 2.11 docs.
>
> Could you all please confirm, update or extend the information below, which
> covers the sections which I believe are currently under active(?) editing.
> I'll then summarise the stat
NR2 Chords -- It's been finished and indexed.
NR2 Fretted strings -- I think it's ready to be indexed
NR1 Rhythms -- I've got it (Carl) I think it'll be a couple of weeks before
I can get it done -- start of school has hit and overwhelmed me as usual.
Carl
On 9/10/08 3:58 AM, "Trevor Daniels"
Doc Team
I'd like to establish the present status of the 2.11 docs.
Could you all please confirm, update or extend the information below, which
covers the sections which I believe are currently under active(?) editing.
I'll then summarise the status of each of the sections so we can see what
21 matches
Mail list logo
