-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am Freitag, 12. September 2008 schrieb Carl D. Sorensen: > Why does a reviewer need to pull source files from git? Can't (shouldn't) > the reviewer do the final review on the docs themselves?
While I'm not in a position to answer that particular question, I still want to point out that the docs on http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/ are automatically built from the latest git master every morning (CEST), so these pages can definitely be used for proof-reading. Of course, to directly create a patch for any typos, grammar errors or reformulations, one needs the .itely files from git... Cheers, Reinhold - -- - ------------------------------------------------------------------ Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/ * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/ * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFIytKvTqjEwhXvPN0RAoa+AKCJS+TbRh71Svyk9412FeBvQ28JRwCeOT0L C18vQ4qbvt0eXEroHgX9kXQ= =sVCc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
