On 1/2/09 6:16 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:41:20AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> In my mind, displayMusic and displayLilyMusic are parallel functions, both
>
> Ok then, I'll go along with it.
>
>> Perhaps you should know that I am also proposing a name c
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 06:41:20AM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> In my mind, displayMusic and displayLilyMusic are parallel functions, both
Ok then, I'll go along with it.
> Perhaps you should know that I am also proposing a name change to NR 6, from
> "Interfaces for programming" to "Exten
ssage -
From: "Carl D. Sorensen"
To: "Trevor Daniels" ; "Graham Percival"
Cc: "lily-devel"
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2009 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: Reorganization of Docs
Trevor wrote:
I agree with Graham. \displayLilyMusic has nothing to
do with the
Trevor wrote:
>
> I agree with Graham. \displayLilyMusic has nothing to
> do with the internal representation of music. It simply
> shows the effect of \transpose.
Graham wrote:
>
> Transposing. Also, translating from relative to absolute. Hey, I
> never claimed that it was *vitally us
Carl
I agree with Graham. \displayLilyMusic has nothing to
do with the internal representation of music. It simply
shows the effect of \transpose.
Are you thinking of \displayMusic maybe, which is already in
NR 6?
Trevor
Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 6:14 AM
On 1/1/09 9:5
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:14:28PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 1/1/09 9:51 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
> > Assuming you're talking about the NR, I kind-of like that material
> > where it is. As the examples show, it can be useful for
> > non-programming stuff. How do you feel abou
On 1/1/09 9:51 PM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:04:36PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>> I am working on a reorganization of LM6 Programming Interfaces.
>
> Err, NR?
Uhhh -- Yep. LM, NR, it's all the same thing after a late night ;)
>
>> I have a section on displ
On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 07:04:36PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> I am working on a reorganization of LM6 Programming Interfaces.
Err, NR?
> I have a section on displaying Scheme representations, and I want to add a
> section on displaying LilyPond representations.
>
> I propose that section 3
I am working on a reorganization of LM6 Programming Interfaces.
One section is on Internal representations.
I have a section on displaying Scheme representations, and I want to add a
section on displaying LilyPond representations.
I propose that section 3.3.4. Displaying LilyPond notation move t
