On Thu, Jan 01, 2009 at 11:14:28PM -0700, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 1/1/09 9:51 PM, "Graham Percival" <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > > Assuming you're talking about the NR, I kind-of like that material > > where it is. As the examples show, it can be useful for > > non-programming stuff. How do you feel about a link in NR 6 to > > the current location? I don't mind if you want to add a short > > example in NR 6 showing how to do this again, if it fits better > > with your narrative. > > How does the example in 3.3.4. show that it's useful for non-programming > stuff? What's the use of it?
Transposing. Also, translating from relative to absolute. Hey, I never claimed that it was *vitally useful* useful. :) > And why does it fit with output? It has nothing to do with program output > -- it's just part of the console output. It has to do with "general input and output". More "general input" syntax, but I certainly wouldn't say that it doesn't belong in NR 3. > I don't see the point of NR 3.3.4. -- it just seems to be a placeholder for > displayLilyMusic. I think a better place for it is in NR 6. But I'm open > to being convinced otherwise. Well, I'm also open to being convinced otherwise... no, that's not quite right. I just don't see it as a big deal. I must admit that NR 3.3 is pretty much an "odds and ends" section. But the best argument I can give is that it doesn't require scheme, so it shouldn't be exclusively in NR 6. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
