Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:12:59AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. > Works great here. Thanks, Han-Wen. -Patrick ___ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread -Eluze
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote: > > Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this? > seems ok now! i get an additional line (compared to former releases) in the log, which i don't know if it is really useful (or maybe i don't understand fully what it means): GNU LilyPond 2.13.1 »__temp__.ly« wird verarbeitet Ana

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp : > Francisco Vila wrote: >> I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings. > > Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox. > > Jon I also have Windows inside VirtualBox. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org ___

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this? thanks, On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:53 PM, -Eluze wrote: > > don't know if it is helpful, but in another score i get the same message with > a different number (line?) > > (lilypond.exe:560): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to > g_win32_get_package_insta

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Paul Scott
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. No error message and the PDF is fine now. Thanks, Paul With 2.13.1 on Debian sid I get: Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'... `gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00 -dCompatibilityLevel=1.

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp : Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run "test.ly" with the latest stable binary on XP. I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings. Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox. Jon -- Jonathan Kulp ht

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp : > Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run "test.ly" > with the latest stable binary on XP. I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org ___

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Jonathan Kulp wrote: On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys : Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF. When I try on XP I still

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys : > > Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. > > That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles > correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF. > > When I try on XP I still get error me

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys : > Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org ___ li

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-05 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps. On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Paul Scott wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. >>> >>> I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit G

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-04 Thread Paul Scott
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-04 Thread Paul Scott
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there is no file gs_init.ps located

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote: > Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org. > > I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too. > > The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports:  there > is no file gs_init.ps located in the installation

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Jonathan Kulp
> > > > If it would help, I can test on Xubuntu 9.04, OSX 10.4, Windows XP and > > Windows 7. > > Certainly! I'm sure not many people are testing on Windows 7 yet, so > this information would be helpful. > > -Patrick > On Windows 7 it has the same terminal error messages as it did in XP: # -*-c

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote: > Patrick McCarty wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila >> wrote: >>> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys : Hi guys, I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due to the savannah

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Jonathan Kulp
On XP it creates .pdf file successfully but there are error messages in the terminal: # -*-compilation-*- Processing `C:/Documents and Settings/Jon/Desktop/213test.ly' Parsing... Interpreting music... Preprocessing graphical objects... programming error: FT_Get_Glyph_Name () error: invalid argumen

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/3 Jonathan Kulp : > Is this problem related to the binary posted at lilypond.org? Exactly, which Han-wen asked to try. > I have no > problems with the 2.13.1 I build from source. Neither do I, but it uses your existing GS install, not latest GS pre-release as GUB does. -- Francisco Vila

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Jonathan Kulp
Patrick McCarty wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys : Hi guys, I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made with an updated GUB version (it now sh

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Patrick McCarty
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: > 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys : >> Hi guys, >> >> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due >> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it).  It was made >> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostsc

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-03 Thread Francisco Vila
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys : > Hi guys, > > I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due > to the savannah problems, the website did not show it).  It was made > with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostscript 8.65).  Please > have a ride and tell me if there are prob

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-02 Thread -Eluze
don't know if it is helpful, but in another score i get the same message with a different number (line?) (lilypond.exe:560): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to g_win32_get_package_installation_directory() is deprecated and it is ignored. -- View this message in context: http://www.

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-02 Thread -Eluze
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote: > > Is this a new warning, or do old versions also exhibit this? > it is new! -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lilypond-2.13.1-up-tp23832510p23834585.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-02 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Is this a new warning, or do old versions also exhibit this? On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM, -Eluze wrote: >> Please have a ride and tell me if there are problems. >> > under windows vista i always get the annoying message > > (lilypond.exe:768): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to >

Re: lilypond 2.13.1 up

2009-06-02 Thread -Eluze
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote: > > Please have a ride and tell me if there are problems. > under windows vista i always get the annoying message " (lilypond.exe:768): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to g_win32_get_package_installation_directory() is deprecated and it is ignored. Solvi