On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 11:12:59AM -0300, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
>
Works great here. Thanks, Han-Wen.
-Patrick
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this?
>
seems ok now!
i get an additional line (compared to former releases) in the log, which i
don't know if it is really useful (or maybe i don't understand fully what it
means):
GNU LilyPond 2.13.1
»__temp__.ly« wird verarbeitet
Ana
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp :
> Francisco Vila wrote:
>> I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
>
> Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox.
>
> Jon
I also have Windows inside VirtualBox.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
Can you check 2.13.1-2 for this?
thanks,
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:53 PM, -Eluze wrote:
>
> don't know if it is helpful, but in another score i get the same message with
> a different number (line?)
>
> (lilypond.exe:560): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to
> g_win32_get_package_insta
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
No error message and the PDF is fine now.
Thanks,
Paul
With 2.13.1 on Debian sid I get:
Converting to `./asthedeertenor.pdf'...
`gs -q -dSAFER -dDEVICEWIDTHPOINTS=612.00 -dDEVICEHEIGHTPOINTS=792.00
-dCompatibilityLevel=1.
Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp :
Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run "test.ly"
with the latest stable binary on XP.
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
Weird. Something must be messed up on my virtualbox.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
ht
2009/6/5 Jonathan Kulp :
> Forgot to mention that I get the same error messages when I run "test.ly"
> with the latest stable binary on XP.
I've tested on XP, too, and I get no errors or warnings.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
When I try on XP I still
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> > Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
>
> That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
> correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
>
>
When I try on XP I still get error me
2009/6/5 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
That newer version does not show the problem I mentioned. It compiles
correctly a minimal document and produces the PDF.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
___
li
Please try 2.13.1-2 to see if this helps.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Paul Scott wrote:
> Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
>>>
>>> I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit G
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
is no file gs_init.ps located
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
is no file gs_init.ps located
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> Yes, I was testing the GUB binary at lilypond.org.
>
> I have just confirmed the problem on 64-bit GNU/Linux too.
>
> The problem seems to be exactly what the error message reports: there
> is no file gs_init.ps located in the installation
>
>
> > If it would help, I can test on Xubuntu 9.04, OSX 10.4, Windows XP and
> > Windows 7.
>
> Certainly! I'm sure not many people are testing on Windows 7 yet, so
> this information would be helpful.
>
> -Patrick
>
On Windows 7 it has the same terminal error messages as it did in XP:
# -*-c
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:36:24PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila
>> wrote:
>>> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
Hi guys,
I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
to the savannah
On XP it creates .pdf file successfully but there are error messages in the
terminal:
# -*-compilation-*-
Processing `C:/Documents and Settings/Jon/Desktop/213test.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
programming error: FT_Get_Glyph_Name () error: invalid argumen
2009/6/3 Jonathan Kulp :
> Is this problem related to the binary posted at lilypond.org?
Exactly, which Han-wen asked to try.
> I have no
> problems with the 2.13.1 I build from source.
Neither do I, but it uses your existing GS install, not latest GS
pre-release as GUB does.
--
Francisco Vila
Patrick McCarty wrote:
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
Hi guys,
I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
with an updated GUB version (it now sh
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
> 2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
>> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
>> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostsc
2009/6/2 Han-Wen Nienhuys :
> Hi guys,
>
> I pushed a new lily release (actually that happened on sunday, but due
> to the savannah problems, the website did not show it). It was made
> with an updated GUB version (it now ships Ghostscript 8.65). Please
> have a ride and tell me if there are prob
don't know if it is helpful, but in another score i get the same message with
a different number (line?)
(lilypond.exe:560): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to
g_win32_get_package_installation_directory() is deprecated and it is
ignored.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> Is this a new warning, or do old versions also exhibit this?
>
it is new!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/lilypond-2.13.1-up-tp23832510p23834585.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
Is this a new warning, or do old versions also exhibit this?
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 11:07 AM, -Eluze wrote:
>> Please have a ride and tell me if there are problems.
>>
> under windows vista i always get the annoying message
>
> (lilypond.exe:768): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to
>
Han-Wen Nienhuys-5 wrote:
>
> Please have a ride and tell me if there are problems.
>
under windows vista i always get the annoying message
"
(lilypond.exe:768): GLib-WARNING **: Passing a non-NULL package to
g_win32_get_package_installation_directory() is deprecated and it is
ignored.
Solvi
25 matches
Mail list logo