Am 07.11.2014 18:46, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 07.11.2014 18:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
What do you mean by this?
Do you suggest to implement a m
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 07.11.2014 18:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
>>> What do you mean by this?
>>> Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somew
Urs Liska writes:
> Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
>> What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
>
> What do you mean by this?
> Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somewhat
> parallel to Scheme's use-module approach?
No, more likely an approach
Am 07.11.2014 18:01, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
What we need is to drag the concept of modules into LilyPond,
What do you mean by this?
Do you suggest to implement a module approach that is somewhat
parallel to Scheme's use-module ap
Am 07.11.2014 12:31, schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
\import harmonic-analysis
would load everything at once (I'd even suggest this command working
with symbolic names and not filenames).
\importFrom harmonic-analysis #'(pitch-class riemann)
would only load the two submodules.
(The
Urs Liska writes:
> \import harmonic-analysis
> would load everything at once (I'd even suggest this command working
> with symbolic names and not filenames).
>
> \importFrom harmonic-analysis #'(pitch-class riemann)
> would only load the two submodules.
> (The submodule would have to \import the
