Re: LP's staff lines are thinner than Henle...

2008-12-15 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 02:07:35PM -0800, Mark Polesky wrote: > I'm intentionally making a big deal out of this because this > is the text on page 2 of the manual, and disingenuous claims > are off-putting to new users. We're trying to "sell" a > product, but our pitch is unconvincing and maybe a l

Re: LP's staff lines are thinner than Henle...

2008-12-15 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
Years ago I made a 4800dpi film in a printshop. It was surprisingly different than a 600dpi laser-print. So to make a fair comparison one should print pages with the same professional technology and see. Bert Carl D. Sorensen wrote: On 12/14/08 11:45 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: LM 1.1 Ba

Re: LP's staff lines are thinner than Henle...

2008-12-15 Thread Carl D. Sorensen
On 12/14/08 11:45 PM, "Mark Polesky" wrote: > LM 1.1 Background - "Engraving" states: > > "our staff lines... are also > much thicker than lines in the > computer edition." > > In both the HTML and PDF versions, LilyPond's staff lines are > in fact the thinnest when compared. I've included a