Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Karlin High writes: > On 3/11/2020 3:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote: >> Rietveld takes OAuth if I understand correctly. While I don't really >> know whether that is "sufficiently neutral and uncontroversial", it is >> something we have depended on for a long time. >> So while it is always good to im

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

On 3/11/2020 3:04 PM, David Kastrup wrote: Rietveld takes OAuth if I understand correctly. While I don't really know whether that is "sufficiently neutral and uncontroversial", it is something we have depended on for a long time. So while it is always good to improve, it doesn't sound like it s

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Karlin High writes: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on > LilyPond development wrote: >> >> Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2020, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: >> > Gerrit itself does not have an authentication service. See >> > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.c

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 1:19 PM Jonas Hahnfeld via Discussions on LilyPond development wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2020, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > > Gerrit itself does not have an authentication service. See > > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/Documentation/config-gerrit

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2020, 18:55 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jonas Hahnfeld < > hah...@hahnjo.de > > wrote: > > > > > Right now, LilyPond's source code is hosted on Savannah [1], our > > > > > issues > > > > > are tracked on SourceForge [2] and we review pat

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > > > Right now, LilyPond's source code is hosted on Savannah [1], our issues > > > > are tracked on SourceForge [2] and we review patches on Rietveld [3]. > > > > There is no synchronization between the systems and a contributor is > > > > r

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 17:16 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > > > [RFC] Gerrit for LilyPond > > > > > > Right now, LilyPond's source code is hosted on Savannah [1], o

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 5:09 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote: > Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > > n the spirit for providing competing options, I hereby offer a Gerrit > > RFC. Note that I'm an obvious fan of Gerrit, but Gitlab seems an > > acceptable solution to me too

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Am Freitag, den 07.02.2020, 12:09 +0100 schrieb Han-Wen Nienhuys: > n the spirit for providing competing options, I hereby offer a Gerrit > RFC. Note that I'm an obvious fan of Gerrit, but Gitlab seems an > acceptable solution to me too. Thanks for writing this up! Even if I said I didn't like Ger

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:36 PM David Kastrup wrote: > >> Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: >> >> > n the spirit for providing competing options, I hereby offer a Gerrit >> > RFC. Note that I'm an obvious fan of Gerrit, but Gitlab seems an >> > acceptable solution to me too. >>

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 3:36 PM David Kastrup wrote: > Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > > > n the spirit for providing competing options, I hereby offer a Gerrit > > RFC. Note that I'm an obvious fan of Gerrit, but Gitlab seems an > > acceptable solution to me too. > > > > > > [RFC] Gerrit for LilyPond

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Han-Wen Nienhuys writes: > n the spirit for providing competing options, I hereby offer a Gerrit > RFC. Note that I'm an obvious fan of Gerrit, but Gitlab seems an > acceptable solution to me too. > > > [RFC] Gerrit for LilyPond If I understand correctly, it would replace the Rietveld part of ou

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

On Fri, Feb 7, 2020 at 12:30 PM Federico Bruni wrote: > Il giorno ven 7 feb 2020 alle 12:09, Han-Wen Nienhuys > ha scritto: > > Gerrit lacks an issue tracker or integrated CI solution > > > This is a big disadvantage IMO. > It means we should keep using SourceForge, right? > > Not necessarily, b

Re: [RFC] switch to Gerrit

Il giorno ven 7 feb 2020 alle 12:09, Han-Wen Nienhuys ha scritto: Gerrit lacks an issue tracker or integrated CI solution This is a big disadvantage IMO. It means we should keep using SourceForge, right? My experience with Sourceforge is terrible, really terrible. It's the worse tracker I've