On 2009-11-30, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 07:34:37PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On 2009-11-29, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > What's the feeling amongst developers about what should be ranked
> > > as priority-Regression (and thus stop a release) ? In particular,
> > > s
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 07:34:37PM -0800, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On 2009-11-29, Graham Percival wrote:
> > What's the feeling amongst developers about what should be ranked
> > as priority-Regression (and thus stop a release) ? In particular,
> > should *everything* that used to work -- even if
On 2009-11-29, Graham Percival wrote:
> What's the feeling amongst developers about what should be ranked
> as priority-Regression (and thus stop a release) ? In particular,
> should *everything* that used to work -- even if it was by
> accident? -- be ranked a Regression?
Maybe we could add labe
What's the feeling amongst developers about what should be ranked
as priority-Regression (and thus stop a release) ? In particular,
should *everything* that used to work -- even if it was by
accident? -- be ranked a Regression?
For example,
- markup \note in time signature: worked in 2.10, curren
