What's the feeling amongst developers about what should be ranked as priority-Regression (and thus stop a release) ? In particular, should *everything* that used to work -- even if it was by accident? -- be ranked a Regression?
For example, - markup \note in time signature: worked in 2.10, currently Defect-Low. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=628 - Tie direction: worked in 2.10 (by accident?), currently Enhancement-Low. http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=592 I don't particularly mind which way we decide, but I'd like it to be consistent, and I'm going to insist that if something is Priority-Regression, it blocks a release. Opinions are only sought from actual developers (i.e. the people who will be fixing such bugs). If you're an interested user or new contributor, then although I would generally encourage you to join the discussion, please don't get involved in this one. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
