ilian Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 12:22:23 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New notehead (accent-shaped with centered stem) +
corresponding doc update
---
input/manual/note-head-style.ly |4 +
input/regression/note-head-style.ly |4 +
lily/include/note-head.hh
> If there are any objections or anyone would like further changes,
> please tell me so.
Just two things regarding your coding style:
. Please use tabs consistently; it sees that some lines use 8
spaces, other lines a tab.
. Stay within the 80 character limit per line if possible.
> Well, I haven't heard any further comments, so I thought I'd just
> provide a patch for the second option (including doc update).
This is fine with me. In case problems arise we could do an optical
tuning later on.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel m
ease tell me so.
Cheers,
Max
From 3240a4a287324e11808d7c01b52a183181c2bd1e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maximilian Albert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:15:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] New notehead (accent-shaped with centered stem) +
corresponding doc update
---
input/manual/note-head-sty
Han-Wen Nienhuys schrieb:
> Regarding the accents, I'm a bit confused still. Why don't you simply
> plug in the existing accent symbol by setting a couple of callbacks ?
Well, we were aiming for a kind of 'calligraphic' look. That is, if
possible the lower 'leg' of the accent should be somewhat t
> Regarding the accents, I'm a bit confused still. Why don't you
> simply plug in the existing accent symbol by setting a couple of
> callbacks ?
For me, the accents sitting *on* a note line appear too fat due to
smearing.
Werner
___
lilypond-de
2007/4/3, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW, the 'marcato' glyph (which I used as guideline for the design)
> doesn't have this correction. Is this intended?
Yes, since it is never positioned on staff lines.
No, this incorrect. The problem is that with equal lines, the junction
(for t
> BTW, the 'marcato' glyph (which I used as guideline for the design)
> doesn't have this correction. Is this intended?
Yes, since it is never positioned on staff lines.
Werner
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> Everything looks very nice! However, I suggest that the inner side of
> the right part of the glyph is drawn a bit slimmer, similar to the `>'
> `sforzato' glyph, which has an optical correction to avoid excessive
> `smearing'.
BTW, the 'marcato' glyph (which I used as gu
Werner LEMBERG schrieb:
> Everything looks very nice! However, I suggest that the inner side of
> the right part of the glyph is drawn a bit slimmer, similar to the `>'
> `sforzato' glyph, which has an optical correction to avoid excessive
> `smearing'.
Thanks for the hint, I hadn't noticed this
> here is a patch for a new accent-shaped notehead, as requested by
> Jamie and Trevor on this list a while ago. An example of what it
> looks like is attached. Would it be possibe to include this in the
> next development release? The second patch is to update the docs.
Everything looks very
Hi everybody,
here is a patch for a new accent-shaped notehead, as requested by Jamie
and Trevor on this list a while ago. An example of what it looks like is
attached. Would it be possibe to include this in the next development
release? The second patch is to update the docs.
Thanks,
Max
>From
12 matches
Mail list logo
