Werner LEMBERG schrieb: > Everything looks very nice! However, I suggest that the inner side of > the right part of the glyph is drawn a bit slimmer, similar to the `>' > `sforzato' glyph, which has an optical correction to avoid excessive > `smearing'.
Thanks for the hint, I hadn't noticed this correction in the sforzato glyph, and most of the time I was looking at magnified versions of the glyphs where the effect of smearing is much less obvious, if at all visible. I attached two corrected pdf versions. In the first one the correction is rather small. I like it a bit better, but I'm again judging from the magnified view. In print the second version may prove more appealing. I would appreciate your input if this is what you had in mind or if you have any further suggestions for enhancement. I will then provide the corresponding patch. Thanks, Max
accent_corrected1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
accent_corrected2.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
