2009/8/10 Neil Puttock :
> Heheh, I'm hoping it won't come to that if I can get the existing test
> to work properly (I'm hopeful making the name longer will work).
Well this is rather puzzling: if I fix the bug, `make check' shows the
correction with a distance of 1.00 (even without changing
2009/8/10 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> ... and added a new regression test for this bug, right? ;-)
Heheh, I'm hoping it won't come to that if I can get the existing test
to work properly (I'm hopeful making the name longer will work).
Regards,
Neil
___
li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 10. August 2009 22:56:09 schrieb Neil Puttock:
> 2009/8/10 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> > Since the patch b8a1b9b174a3b68f05bb3e08fb5f754649b92574, short
> > instrument names for harakiried staves are still printed (above each
> > other, at the to
2009/8/10 Reinhold Kainhofer :
> Since the patch b8a1b9b174a3b68f05bb3e08fb5f754649b92574, short instrument
> names for harakiried staves are still printed (above each other, at the top of
> the system).
Oh dear, that's not good. :)
It looks like I should have paid more attention to
`instrument-n
Since the patch b8a1b9b174a3b68f05bb3e08fb5f754649b92574, short instrument
names for harakiried staves are still printed (above each other, at the top of
the system).
Example attached.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
--
Reinhold Kainhofer, re
