2009/8/10 Neil Puttock <n.putt...@gmail.com>: > Heheh, I'm hoping it won't come to that if I can get the existing test > to work properly (I'm hopeful making the name longer will work).
Well this is rather puzzling: if I fix the bug, `make check' shows the correction with a distance of 1.000000 (even without changing shortInstrumentName), whereas testing current master against a baseline of 1ac472 (just before the instrument name patch) doesn't reveal the regression. Can anybody explain what's going on? Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
