On 01/07/2010 04:24 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 16:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> Just had a successful build on line, it fails because of permissions on
>> the info dir though, it was either "export GS_LIB="/home/$USER/.fonts"
>> or "# noroo
On 01/07/2010 04:24 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 16:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> Just had a successful build on line, it fails because of permissions on
>> the info dir though, it was either "export GS_LIB="/home/$USER/.fonts"
>> or "# noroo
Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 16:03 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
> Just had a successful build on line, it fails because of permissions on
> the info dir though, it was either "export GS_LIB="/home/$USER/.fonts"
> or "# norootforbuild" that did it.
Then you just may have found a workar
On 01/07/2010 12:15 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 12:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>> On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>>> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
>>> Plater:
>>>
>
>> I'
Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 12:44 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
> On 01/07/2010 12:06 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 11:39 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> It could also be some sort of corruption in the input layout file
That could be, but a segfault
On 01/07/2010 12:15 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 12:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>> On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>>> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
>>> Plater:
>>>
>
>> I'
On 01/07/2010 12:06 PM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 11:39 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> This is where it starts to go wrong but there are many successful gs
>> commands and only the one that fails.
>>
> That's what you call a bug, right?
>
>
Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 12:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
> On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> > Plater:
> I'm busy updating your bug but meanwhile can you try the gs command as
> root?
Yes,
Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 11:39 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
> This is where it starts to go wrong but there are many successful gs
> commands and only the one that fails.
That's what you call a bug, right?
> If you're interested in gs-1.70, I've installed the fc10 src rpm with
>
On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> Sorry at the beginning of this mail I said I suspected ghostscript, this
>> is what I get in the failed build after the first mention of "Processing
>> `./3f/li
On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
> Plater:
>
>
>> Sorry at the beginning of this mail I said I suspected ghostscript, this
>> is what I get in the failed build after the first mention of "Processing
>> `./3f/li
Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave
Plater:
> Sorry at the beginning of this mail I said I suspected ghostscript, this
> is what I get in the failed build after the first mention of "Processing
> `./3f/lily-65a7b1b1.ly'" :-
> `gs -dNOSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibility
On 01/07/2010 08:31 AM, Dave Plater wrote:
> Hi, I maintain lilypond on openSUSE and am having a problem compiling
> the documentation, a local build with rpmbuild succeeds but a chrooted
> build fails seemingly on a ghostscript command. I've come to the
> conclusion, after many long builds (one an
Hi, I maintain lilypond on openSUSE and am having a problem compiling
the documentation, a local build with rpmbuild succeeds but a chrooted
build fails seemingly on a ghostscript command. I've come to the
conclusion, after many long builds (one and a half hours locally and
half hour online), that
14 matches
Mail list logo