On 01/07/2010 10:37 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > Op donderdag 07-01-2010 om 09:02 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Dave > Plater: > > >> Sorry at the beginning of this mail I said I suspected ghostscript, this >> is what I get in the failed build after the first mention of "Processing >> `./3f/lily-65a7b1b1.ly'" :- >> `gs -dNOSAFER -dEPSCrop -dCompatibilityLevel=1.4 -dNOPAUSE -dBATCH >> -r1200 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile="./3f/lily-65a7b1b1-1.pdf" -c >> .setpdfwrite -f "./3f/lily-65a7b1b1-1.eps"' failed (11) >> > Right. This is the command I filed a bug report for and asked you to > check a few days ago, see > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-01/msg00147.html > > Glad to learn it fails for you too. Hopefully this helps the > ghostscript maintainers to update a bit more quickly and frequently :-) > > Greetings, > Jan. > > I'm busy updating your bug but meanwhile can you try the gs command as root? That will help to eliminate that possibility. I'm using the same 11.2 up to date x86_64 system for all of my builds or trying to duplicate my system in the chrooted builds anyway. Regards Dave P
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
