Reviewers: ,
Message:
passes make, make check and a full make doc.
Description:
Doc: CG minor corrections to 2.1 LilyDev
Minor corrections to CG 2.1
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/277450043/
Affected files (+4, -4 lines):
M Documentation/contributor/quick-start.itexi
Hi Till,
Sorry for the delay :-/
Le dimanche 28 juin 2009 à 11:00 +0300, Till Rettig a écrit :
> first time I consulted the contributor's guide.
It's never too late :-) (it's never too late either for me to work on it
again :-P)
> in 3.7.2 Documentation translation details you have different s
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 07:47:22PM +0300, Till Paala wrote:
> Graham Percival schrieb:
>
> On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:00:13AM +0300, Till Rettig wrote:
>
> The texinfo file is still install.texi. The info in that file
> were split between @section install and @section compile, but it
Graham Percival schrieb:
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:00:13AM +0300, Till Rettig wrote:
A bit later there is mentioned the install.itely -- didn't it get parted
into install and compile?
The texinfo file is still install.texi. The info in that file
were split between @section install a
Op woensdag 01-07-2009 om 00:24 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Graham
Percival:
> That said, this might change in the near future; binary install
> instructions are on the website, and compiling only needs to be in
> the CG. Stay tuned. :)
Just to be clear on this, compiling and dependency infor
On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 11:00:13AM +0300, Till Rettig wrote:
> A bit later there is mentioned the install.itely -- didn't it get parted
> into install and compile?
The texinfo file is still install.texi. The info in that file
were split between @section install and @section compile, but it's
st
Hi John,
first time I consulted the contributor's guide. It's now much easier to
read than the old text file. Some things made me stumbel upon, though:
in 3.7.2 Documentation translation details you have different starting
points for the individual files: mostly you start from LL-directory, bu
On 31-Mar-06, at 3:18 AM, Erlend Aasland wrote:
The 2.8 news page
(http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html) says
"New features in 2.7...", but it should obviously say "New features in
2.8".
Already fixed, thanks.
- Graham
_
Hi,The 2.8 news page (http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.8/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS.html) says "New features in 2.7...", but it should obviously say "New features in
2.8".Regards, Erlend Aasland
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://li
