Am Dienstag, dem 05.10.2021 um 22:14 +0200 schrieb Jean Abou Samra:
> I don't know when the next point release in
> the 2.22 series will be. It may be a bit
> late by then, no idea.
Or "if there will be a next point release". There's nothing critical
that would warrant that (only a few minor thing
> Would it be conceivable to do Homebrew builds also for (odd-numbered)
development versions of LilyPond?
According to homebrew rules, only stable versions are accepted. And really,
there is no * -devel package in the homebrew repository. About that, I
believe we can patch the formula until the ne
[Felix]
I was referring to the next minor version.
OK. If as you're proposing in the MR this gets
integrated in Homebrew via a fast path rather
than a release on our side, everyody's happy.
[Lukas]
[Jean]
What kind of next version, next minor of
current stable, i.e. 2.22.2, or next
stable
[Jean]
What kind of next version, next minor of
current stable, i.e. 2.22.2, or next
stable release, 2.24?
Which leads me to ask:
@Jefferson: Would it be conceivable to do Homebrew builds also for
(odd-numbered) development versions of LilyPond? LilyPond tends to have
a conservative policy re
> What kind of next release, next minor to the current stable release ie
2.22.2, or next stable release 2.24?
I was referring to the next minor version.
> Regarding 2.24, hopefully we can have switched to Guile 2 permanently at
that point.
Sounds good, so homebrew users can hunt for bugs at this
[Felix]
> I like the principle. However, Homebrew seems to want versioned tarballs, and I am not sure Phil and Jonas
should have to go through the multi-hour release process for this.
I believe it's okay for this change to wait for the next version
release of Lilypond.
What kind of next versio
> I like the principle. However, Homebrew seems to want versioned tarballs,
and I am not sure Phil and Jonas should have to go through the multi-hour
release process for this.
I believe it's okay for this change to wait for the next version release of
Lilypond.
Em ter., 5 de out. de 2021 às 16:44,
On 2021-10-05 12:42 pm, Jefferson Felix wrote:
I just did this change locally, only the message is different (running
Guile 2), because someone also can build from source using guile 2.
I agree with this solution.
Would it make any sense for LilyPond in general to be able to report
dependenci
Am Dienstag, dem 05.10.2021 um 16:44 -0300 schrieb Jefferson Felix:
> I have a question (I'm not very familiar w/ guile2 and lilypond source
> structure), but is it possible to build with guile1 and run with guile2,
> and vice-versa?
No, the lilypond executable links to either version of the libra
I have a question (I'm not very familiar w/ guile2 and lilypond source
structure), but is it possible to build with guile1 and run with guile2,
and vice-versa?
Em ter., 5 de out. de 2021 às 16:42, Jefferson Felix
escreveu:
> I just did this change locally, only the message is different (running
I just did this change locally, only the message is different (running
Guile 2), because someone also can build from source using guile 2.
I agree with this solution.
Em ter., 5 de out. de 2021 às 15:25, Jean Abou Samra
escreveu:
> [Lukas]
> > Would it be considered reasonable to hard-wire a sp
[Lukas]
Would it be considered reasonable to hard-wire a special
startup message in LilyPond proper if it is being built
with Guile2 (or rather: detects guile-2 on startup)?
I like the principle. However, Homebrew seems to want versioned
tarballs, and I am not sure Phil and Jonas should have t
Folks,
Am 05.10.21 um 14:39 schrieb Jefferson Felix:
No problem, I was just pointing out the reasons why Guile 1.8.8 was
not approved by the homebrew core. I even believe this will help
advance Guile 2 compatibility, and certainly the Lilypond development
community will pick up on any bugs.
Yes, exactly. We don't use patches and code replacements are avoided as
much as possible.
Em ter., 5 de out. de 2021 às 09:53, Lukas-Fabian Moser
escreveu:
> Folks,
>
> Am 05.10.21 um 14:39 schrieb Jefferson Felix:
> > No problem, I was just pointing out the reasons why Guile 1.8.8 was
> > not
14 matches
Mail list logo
