Re: GUB dist-check failure

2012-08-22 Thread John Mandereau
Le mercredi 22 août 2012 à 20:20 +0200, David Kastrup a écrit : > And people wonder why I am queasy about taking last-minute build-system > changes into the stable branch. The change that introduced this breakage (tracker issue 2719) has been put for review on Rietveld on August 7th (more than two

Re: GUB dist-check failure

2012-08-22 Thread David Kastrup
John Mandereau writes: > Le mercredi 22 août 2012 à 18:43 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : >> Presumably the script was tested with bash, but was being run with >> sh or dash? or something like that? > > I tested "make dist" succesfully on my system, but without being sure if > sh on my distro w

Re: GUB dist-check failure

2012-08-22 Thread John Mandereau
Le mercredi 22 août 2012 à 18:43 +0100, Graham Percival a écrit : > Presumably the script was tested with bash, but was being run with > sh or dash? or something like that? I tested "make dist" succesfully on my system, but without being sure if sh on my distro would behave as bash or not... Spa

Re: GUB dist-check failure

2012-08-22 Thread David Kastrup
Graham Percival writes: > Presumably the script was tested with bash, but was being run with > sh or dash? or something like that? Which script? > git > --git-dir=/main/src/gub/target/linux-x86/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/.git > show HEAD | head -100 > out/RELEAS

GUB dist-check failure

2012-08-22 Thread Graham Percival
Presumably the script was tested with bash, but was being run with sh or dash? or something like that? - Graham git --git-dir=/main/src/gub/target/linux-x86/src/lilypond-git.sv.gnu.org--lilypond.git-release-unstable/.git show HEAD | head -100 > out/RELEASE-COMMIT make[5]: Leaving directory `/ma