Re: GSoC page

Thanks for the replies, I've opened https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilypond/-/merge_requests/1599 Best, Jean

Re: GSoC page

> - Variants of font glyphs: Werner, is this still relevant? Yes. Werner

Re: GSoC page

Hi all, > - Support for style sheets: Abraham, Kieren? Definitely still available to be, and interested in being, the “Community Mentor” on that! Thanks, Kieren.

GSoC page

Hi, The page https://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html look somewhat outdated, it says it's for GSoC 2018, and there is still the SMuFL project taken by Owen for example. Can we update it? - SMuFL: taken by Owen, should be removed - Variants of font glyphs: Werner, is this still relevant

Re: Website upload (was: Obsolete GSoC page)

pect this won't answer your question, but does move the issue forward. Please ask more - if I can answer, I will. -- Phil Holmes - Original Message - From: "Urs Liska" To: Sent: Monday, March 06, 2017 9:50 PM Subject: Website upload (was: Obsolete GSoC page) Phil,

Website upload (was: Obsolete GSoC page)

Phil, could you tell us how you (you do that, isn't it?) how you upload the website? Urs Am 06.03.2017 um 11:59 schrieb Urs Liska: > > Am 6. März 2017 11:41:54 MEZ schrieb Federico Bruni : >> Il giorno lun 6 mar 2017 alle 11:27, Federico Bruni >> ha scritto: >>> gsoc-2012.html is generated by

Re: Obsolete GSoC page

Am 6. März 2017 11:41:54 MEZ schrieb Federico Bruni : >Il giorno lun 6 mar 2017 alle 11:27, Federico Bruni > ha scritto: >> gsoc-2012.html is generated by an existing node: "@node GSoC 2012", >> as shown by the grep above. > >Sorry, you are right: the english file shouldn't be there (only catal

Re: Obsolete GSoC page

Il giorno lun 6 mar 2017 alle 11:27, Federico Bruni ha scritto: gsoc-2012.html is generated by an existing node: "@node GSoC 2012", as shown by the grep above. Sorry, you are right: the english file shouldn't be there (only catalan and chinese files). __

Re: Obsolete GSoC page

Il giorno lun 6 mar 2017 alle 10:56, Urs Liska ha scritto: IIRC there's a page for every @node, so: $ git grep -i "@node gsoc" Documentation/ca/web/community.itexi:@node GSoC 2012 Documentation/zh/web/community.itexi:@node GSoC 2012 seems to confirm your hypothesis that the website sync didn't

Re: Obsolete GSoC page

Am 06.03.2017 um 10:16 schrieb Federico Bruni: > > > Il giorno lun 6 mar 2017 alle 7:20, Urs Liska ha > scritto: >> Am 06.03.2017 um 05:02 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: >> >> PS: If I do a google search for `lilypond gsoc', the first hit is >> the old http://lilypond.org/gsoc.html and only the

Re: Obsolete GSoC page (was: GSoC 2017)

Il giorno lun 6 mar 2017 alle 7:20, Urs Liska ha scritto: Am 06.03.2017 um 05:02 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: PS: If I do a google search for `lilypond gsoc', the first hit is the old http://lilypond.org/gsoc.html and only the second hit is the current http://lilypo

Obsolete GSoC page (was: GSoC 2017)

Am 06.03.2017 um 05:02 schrieb Werner LEMBERG: > PS: If I do a google search for `lilypond gsoc', the first hit is the > old > > http://lilypond.org/gsoc.html > > and only the second hit is the current > > http://lilypond.org/google-summer-of-code.html > > Any chance to fi

Re: Web: Review GSoC page introduction (issue 315410043 by g...@ursliska.de)

g...@ursliska.de writes: > https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi > File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode952 > Documentation/web/community.itex

Re: Web: Review GSoC page introduction (issue 315410043 by g...@ursliska.de)

https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode952 Documentation/web/community.itexi:952: @subheading Adopt the SMuF

Re: Web: Review GSoC page introduction (issue 315410043 by g...@ursliska.de)

https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/315410043/diff/40001/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode952 Documentation/web/community.itexi:952: @subheading Adopt the SMuF

Re: Web: Review GSoC page (issue 285400043 by g...@ursliska.de)

Am 8. Februar 2016 15:35:33 MEZ, schrieb paulwmor...@gmail.com: . > >> Hm, my intention was to draw the attention to the fact that this >project relates >> to actual engraving quality. But I've taken your suggestion. > >Hmm... that's a good idea. Maybe add this to the title? "Improve >engraving

Re: Web: Review GSoC page (issue 285400043 by g...@ursliska.de)

LGTM, with one minor suggestion. Thanks Urs, I think this really improves this page. -Paul https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/communit

Re: Web: Review GSoC page (issue 285400043 by g...@ursliska.de)

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode909 Documentation/web/community.itexi:909: anyone who is interested in develo

Web: Review GSoC page (issue 285400043 by g...@ursliska.de)

Thanks for working on this Urs. Here are my strong opinions and suggested revisions. Make of them what you will! -Paul https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/di