Original-Nachricht
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >> For instance I could imagine
> >> a chapter "Ancient music", and one on educational subjects. At least I
> >> don't see why Ancient is "instrument specific", so why not put it in 7
> >> from the current suggestion, right after education
On 9/11/07, Rune Zedeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valentin Villenave skrev:
>
> > Why does "decorating" have a negative meaning to everyone but me?
> > Your suggestions are fine too, though.
>
> The problems are
> - even though the term makes sense, it is quite difficult to uniquely
> determine
Valentin Villenave skrev:
Why does "decorating" have a negative meaning to everyone but me?
Your suggestions are fine too, though.
The problems are
- even though the term makes sense, it is quite difficult to uniquely
determine whether a specific feature is "decorating"
- Separating decoratin
2007/9/11, Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
For instance I could imagine
a chapter "Ancient music", and one on educational subjects. At least I
don't see why Ancient is "instrument specific", so why not put it in 7
from the current suggestion, right after educational and special notehead
2007/9/11, Till Rettig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hello,
> For instance I could imagine
> a chapter "Ancient music", and one on educational subjects. At least I
> don't see why Ancient is "instrument specific", so why not put it in 7
> from the current suggestion, right after educational and special no
Hello,
from what so far has been discussed I catched somewhat the need is to
group the issues more into "single topic" sections of subsections.
For the discussion about the format of the html-docu: I would rather
like to have whole subsections downloading than those tiny pages -- I
also get l
John Mandereau wrote:
Tu sum up your suggestion, which I like quite much, I propose the
following section (inside chapter 7 "Decorating musical notation", and
replacing "Special use"):
7.6 Note heads and stems
7.6.1 Stems
7.6.2 Special noteheads
7.6.3 Improvisation
7.6.4 Selecting no
Le lundi 10 septembre 2007 à 05:22 -0700, Graham Percival a écrit :
> Rune Zedeler wrote:
> > Very first I comment on the stuff I wrote below: When I wrote it I
> > didn't really notice / think about the fact the the first five sections
> > are left out. Probably some of my comments are not total
Le lundi 10 septembre 2007 à 14:37 +0200, Mats Bengtsson a écrit :
> Graham Percival wrote:
> >
> >>>+ 6.6.2 Stems
> >>
> >> Currently, this subsection has nothing to do with polyphony.
> >> Furthermore it is layout specific, and should therefore be postponed.
> >
> > I have _always
Graham Percival wrote:
+ 6.6.2 Stems
Currently, this subsection has nothing to do with polyphony.
Furthermore it is layout specific, and should therefore be postponed.
I have _always_ hated this section. I remember trying -- and failing
-- to find a home for it when I did
Rune Zedeler wrote:
Very first I comment on the stuff I wrote below: When I wrote it I
didn't really notice / think about the fact the the first five sections
are left out. Probably some of my comments are not totally valid. Well,
I will think some more, and post another message about the overa
Very first I comment on the stuff I wrote below: When I wrote it I
didn't really notice / think about the fact the the first five sections
are left out. Probably some of my comments are not totally valid. Well,
I will think some more, and post another message about the overall
structure of the
Graham Percival skrev:
Well, don't I feel like a complete newbie. :/Does anybody know how
to make Thunderbird treat text like pure bloody text, and not change the
displayed text when it sends an email out? thanks in advance. :(
I don't know what you did wrong.
I just copypasted the belo
Well, don't I feel like a complete newbie. :/Does anybody know how
to make Thunderbird treat text like pure bloody text, and not change the
displayed text when it sends an email out? thanks in advance. :(
I added the sectioning here:
http://lilypondwiki.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Doc
14 matches
Mail list logo
