Le lundi 10 septembre 2007 à 14:37 +0200, Mats Bengtsson a écrit : > Graham Percival wrote: > > > >>> + 6.6.2 Stems > >> > >> Currently, this subsection has nothing to do with polyphony. > >> Furthermore it is layout specific, and should therefore be postponed. > > > > I have _always_ hated this section. I remember trying -- and failing > > -- to find a home for it when I did my very first doc rearrangement, > > and it's still a pain. > > > > Help? Anybody have a suggestion for where to move this to? (or > > perhaps delete entirely, and put info about \stemDown... where?) > How about some combined subsection on (ordinary) notes which deals with > both > note heads and stems? Currently, we don't have any specific subsection > on note > heads (though there are a few related to special notation). Any section > that > describes \xxxDown and \xxxUp macros should also refer to the section > that describes \voiceOne and \voiceTwo, since that's mostly a better > solution. > (Sorry, couldn't help leaving the structure and talking about content > for a moment).
Tu sum up your suggestion, which I like quite much, I propose the following section (inside chapter 7 "Decorating musical notation", and replacing "Special use"): 7.6 Note heads and stems 7.6.1 Stems 7.6.2 Special noteheads 7.6.3 Improvisation 7.6.4 Selecting notation font size 7.6.5 Hidden notes 7.6.6 Parentheses My two cents: maybe "Parentheses" should be included in a (sub)section in chapter 7, called "Editorial notation", which would also deal with bracketed dynamics for example. Then, I don't know where to move "Coloring objects", what a pain! What about including it as an example subsection in "9.3 The \override command", with proper index entries, and adding a "See also" link from the main page of chapter 7? Cheers, John _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
