Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:35:13 +0100 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd suggest having references to the following, based on my limited > knowledge of the harp: I've dumped these into unfretted-strings.itely, but in general I dno't think it's worth discussing it until somebody is actua

Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, 12 May 2008 12:23:01 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At the risk of being as cheeky with you as I am with Valentin, > > You wouldn't dare! Given that I just *did*, I clearly /would/ dare. :) > > what about NR 1.1.4 Shape note heads? ;) > > This certainly covers

Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-12 Thread Neil Puttock
2008/5/12 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Graham Percival wrote Monday, May 12, 2008 9:48 AM > > > > On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:13:27 +0100 > > "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > IMO, yes. (although in this specific case, it might be better to > > > > direct people to the

Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-12 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Monday, May 12, 2008 9:48 AM On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:13:27 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:44 PM > I've commented it out; > if/when somebody takes this section, they can decide whether to > definitely delete i

Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-12 Thread Graham Percival
On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:13:27 +0100 "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:44 PM > > I've commented it out; > > if/when somebody takes this section, they can decide whether to > > definitely delete it or not. > > The actual content needs to be r

Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-12 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, May 11, 2008 10:44 PM On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:32:37 +0100 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been looking through section 2, and noticed that the section on harps mentions Sacred Harp music. Now I can't claim much knowledge of old American choral tradit

Re: GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-11 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, 11 May 2008 22:32:37 +0100 "Neil Puttock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been looking through section 2, and noticed that the section on > harps mentions Sacred Harp music. Now I can't claim much knowledge of > old American choral traditions, but I'm pretty sure that it has > nothing to

GDP: 2.3.2.1 Harp

2008-05-11 Thread Neil Puttock
Hi everybody, I've been looking through section 2, and noticed that the section on harps mentions Sacred Harp music. Now I can't claim much knowledge of old American choral traditions, but I'm pretty sure that it has nothing to do with playing the harp. Since there's no specific support for harps