2008/5/12 Trevor Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Graham Percival wrote Monday, May 12, 2008 9:48 AM > > > > On Mon, 12 May 2008 09:13:27 +0100 > > "Trevor Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > IMO, yes. (although in this specific case, it might be better to > > > > direct people to the keyboard section) > > > > > > Harps certainly have specialist notation but it is not > > > currently supported by LilyPond. > > > > > > > I should have said it is not *all* currently supported by > LilyPond. I was thinking of the harp pedal symbols. But > quite a lot of the harp notation can be done already (search > for harp in the -user archives) and pointers to these could > all be grouped under a references section.
I'd suggest having references to the following, based on my limited knowledge of the harp: - glissandi - tremolo (for bisbigliando) - natural harmonics - directional arpeggio and non-arpeggio - workaroung for keeping both staves visible in an orchestral score, http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-08/msg00386.html and http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?u=1&id=312 An LSR snippet could be used to demonstrate the main items; in the case of glissandi, it would be desirable to have a demonstration of different styles. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
