On Sat, 2009-10-24 at 14:01 -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:18 -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> >> - LilyPond 2.13.5 currently has a vertical spacing problem (no padding
> >> between staves).
> >
> > how about this:
> >
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Joe Neeman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:18 -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
>> - LilyPond 2.13.5 currently has a vertical spacing problem (no padding
>> between staves).
>
> how about this:
> \layout {
> \context {
> \PianoStaff
> \override StaffGrouper #'
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> Generally looking good. A few comments, mostly minor:
>
> a) Page 2 has the phrase "Not let down, we created a font of musical
> symbols"
> "Not to be deterred," or "Undiscouraged," would be better.
>
> b) Where you compare the
Hi Andrew,
Hi everyone, I'm working on the LilyPond essay
That's great! Thanks.
I'm definitely going to use whatever version you have by October 31st
in my upcoming lecture series (3-5 November).
- LilyPond’s stems are often shorter than any of the references,
especially RH mm. 31.
Pleas
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:18 -0600, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> - LilyPond 2.13.5 currently has a vertical spacing problem (no padding
> between staves).
how about this:
\layout {
\context {
\PianoStaff
\override StaffGrouper #'between-staff-spacing #'padding = #0.5
}
}
If you find a good
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Hawryluk"
To: "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:18 AM
Subject: Engraving essay questions and RFC
Hi everyone, I'm working on the LilyPond essay, and I'm ready to ask
you some questions.
You can read my curr
Op donderdag 08-10-2009 om 19:08 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Andrew
Hawryluk:
> Thanks, those are good points. Do you have copies of the scores in
> question? For the PDF version I'd love to get some scans at 300 or 600
> dpi so they could be reproduced at (nearly) full size.
I've put up some s
> "Andrew" == Andrew Hawryluk writes:
Andrew> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Andrew> wrote:
Andrew> Speaking of the benchmarking examples, do you (or anyone else)
Andrew> have PDF versions of the old LilyPond output? (e.g. version
Andrew> 1.4 or 2.1.5?) I know the odds a
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:12 -0600
>> From: Andrew Hawryluk
>> Subject: Engraving essay questions and RFC
>> To: lilypond-devel
>> Message-ID:
>> <11cc7c4f091
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:25 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen
wrote:
> Op woensdag 07-10-2009 om 22:18 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Andrew
> Hawryluk:
>
>> Have I missed anything?
>> Please discuss?
>
> What about the bland look of the henle 666 edition of the solo cello
> suites compared with baerenreiter's
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:12 -0600
> From: Andrew Hawryluk
> Subject: Engraving essay questions and RFC
> To: lilypond-devel
> Message-ID:
> <11cc7c4f0910072118p562a3e4fj2d167172fcb88...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; char
Op woensdag 07-10-2009 om 22:18 uur [tijdzone -0600], schreef Andrew
Hawryluk:
> Have I missed anything?
> Please discuss?
What about the bland look of the henle 666 edition of the solo cello
suites compared with baerenreiter's?
For me, this grasps the essence of
* what is wrong with compute
Hi everyone, I'm working on the LilyPond essay, and I'm ready to ask
you some questions.
You can read my current draft at http://www.musicbyandrew.ca/essay.pdf
(this is identical to a doc build with my latest patch, except that I
have only updated the pages containing the new essay, leaving out th
13 matches
Mail list logo
