> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 22:18:12 -0600
> From: Andrew Hawryluk <ahawry...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Engraving essay questions and RFC
> To: lilypond-devel <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
> Message-ID:
> <11cc7c4f0910072118p562a3e4fj2d167172fcb88...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
>
Hi Andrew,
This looks great to me- I like seeing Lilypond compared to several
other editions of the same piece at the end.
I just have one comment about the following:
> - Finale’s beamed stems are almost always too long when
> they extend
> off the staff.
Your benchmarking method currently takes the default output and compares it to
classic engravings. But this means you're considering things
like the "Patterson Beams" plugin in Finale a tweak; yet it is an
automated tool that takes two or three mouse-clicks and is a standard part
of the engraving process for any serious Finale user.
Also, I really think it would be helpful to additionally show fully
tweaked versions of both the Finale and Lilypond scores, to give an idea
of the techniques/time necessary to get optimal output in both pieces of
software. I think I can get a copyist to do this on the Finale
side if you're interested.
-Jonathan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
