On 8-Sep-04, at 3:51 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that this patch better reflects the way accents are placed.
May I
apply it?
In my recollection the > accent goes into the staff. Are you sure
about removing follow-into-staff ?
No, I'm not. :) After checking some
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> On 3-Sep-04, at 12:12 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >> Judging from scm/script/scm, LilyPond appears to try to place the
> >> accent underneath the slur. My recollection is that the accent (the
> >> ->
> >> kind) goes above the slur.
On 3-Sep-04, at 12:12 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judging from scm/script/scm, LilyPond appears to try to place the
accent underneath the slur. My recollection is that the accent (the
->
kind) goes above the slur. Comments?
Yes: please check in multiple reputable scores
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On the other side, I think the second slur is perfect.
>
> I think the problem arises because the first and third slurs are on top
> of the accent, whereas the second slur is underneath the accent. We
> recently changed the way that slurs and articulations interact
On 31-Aug-04, at 2:32 AM, Maurizio Tomasi wrote:
I think that the PDF file Lilypond 2.3.13 produces with the following
input has some layout problem:
\relative c''' {
c8.->-\trill( b32 c) % 1
c,8.->-\trill( b32 c) % 2
c'8.->-\trill( b32 c) % 3
c,4
}
Of the three slur, the first an
