On 8-Sep-04, at 3:51 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think that this patch better reflects the way accents are placed.
May I
apply it?
In my recollection the > accent goes into the staff. Are you sure
about removing follow-into-staff ?
No, I'm not. :) After checking some scores, I see that you're right.
So how about this patch?
--- scm/script.scm Sat Sep 11 15:35:06 2004
+++ scm/scripts.scm.new Sun Sep 12 16:59:33 2004
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
((script-stencil . (feta . ("thumb" . "thumb")))
(direction . 1)))
("accent" .
- ((inside-slur . #t)
+ ((inside-slur . #f)
(follow-into-staff . #t)
(script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" . "sforzato")))
(side-relative-direction . -1)))
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
