On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 00:17:46 +0800
Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for looking into this. I just uploaded lilypond_2.1.0-1 to
> Debian's archive.
Thanks for your great work with packing Lilypond. One question, though:
why 2.1.0 instead of 2.0.1? 2.0.x is the stable branch; I thi
Hello all,
Thanks for looking into this. I just uploaded lilypond_2.1.0-1 to
Debian's archive. It is in http://incoming.debian.org/ this moment.
I added the symlink for "type1" and the "dvips -Ppdf -u +lilypond.map
myscore.dvi" seems to produce a PS file with the correct font.
Please let me know
* Mats Bengtsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Of course, Anthony's solution is neat but requires that the
> package maintainer is always up-to-date with the changes in
> LilyPond and might cause a real mess if someone wants to
> build and install a development version of LilyPond somewhere
> else o
All other distributions I know of install the files
buildscripts/out/{lilypond-profile,lilypond-login} in
/etc/profile.d/, which means that they are sourced automatically
as soon as you start a new shell. (Watch out about the naming,
it may be necessary to renamve them to lilypond-profile.sh and
li
Mats,
> Maybe this is a non-issue, but could you please verify if
> dvips -Ppdf -u +lilypond.map myscore.dvi
> works correctly with the Debian installation.
No it doesn't :-(
I'll file a bug report to debian, but before, could you tell me how
this is addressed in other distributions? Maybe I'll
A side-note related to the Debian package:
I don't have any Debian installation available but looked briefly
at the contents of the package and the installation scripts when
answering a question earlier today.
I'm confused about the installation of the PFA files and lilypond.map.
In contrast to mo
