On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 00:17:46 +0800 Anthony Fok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for looking into this. I just uploaded lilypond_2.1.0-1 to > Debian's archive.
Thanks for your great work with packing Lilypond. One question, though: why 2.1.0 instead of 2.0.1? 2.0.x is the stable branch; I think it might be more useful to include the stable branch as a debian package instead of the unstable 2.1.x. (right now 2.1.0 is pretty close to stable, but that will change later on in the devel cycle) In addition, do we still need the dummy package "lilypond1.3" ? I don't really know much about apt, dpkg, and deb, but I'd imagine that its usefulness has ended. Cheers, - Graham Percival _______________________________________________ Lilypond-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
