Jonathan Kulp Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:13 PM
Ok I think this makefile and the linux version are about ready for
the docs. Trevor, do you think it's logical to put this topic in
the vicinity of "Score and Parts" or handling large projects? For
the moment I'll just write the texinfo source f
Am 27.05.2009, 07:25 Uhr, schrieb Henning Plumeyer :
BTW: I got no difference with the "-djob-count" or without it.
With the option: 2:45.218
without: 2:45.000(!)
(On a 2.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core Processor--is that a normal time?)
Seems as if the option should be omitted on Wi
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
Am 27.05.2009, 04:41 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp :
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
Am 26.05.2009, 04:13 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp
:
I had to comment out one more thing before it would run properly,
though--the "-djob-count" option, something we put in on the Linux
version t
Am 27.05.2009, 04:41 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp :
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
Am 26.05.2009, 04:13 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp
:
I had to comment out one more thing before it would run properly,
though--the "-djob-count" option, something we put in on the Linux
version to take advantage of du
Henning Plumeyer wrote:
Am 26.05.2009, 04:13 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp :
I had to comment out one more thing before it would run properly,
though--the "-djob-count" option, something we put in on the Linux
version to take advantage of dual processors. It choked on that
saying "unbound varia
Am 26.05.2009, 04:13 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp :
I had to comment out one more thing before it would run properly,
though--the "-djob-count" option, something we put in on the Linux
version to take advantage of dual processors. It choked on that saying
"unbound variable 'primitive-fork'".
>> Uuh, you are using `%.midi' in the rule but you are moving *.mid
>> files! You should use `%.mid' too since this is what lilypond
>> creates if run on Windows, right? The comment should be updated
>> accordingly.
>
> You're right, but oddly, it worked as expected even without fixing
> the patt
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
If there is at least one blank (on a german Windows the home
directory is called "c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\")
searching does not work.
I suggest that you contact the help-m...@gnu.org mailing list,
providing a minimal (trivial) example demonstrating the VPATH problem
>> If there is at least one blank (on a german Windows the home
>> directory is called "c:\Dokumente und Einstellungen\")
>> searching does not work.
I suggest that you contact the help-m...@gnu.org mailing list,
providing a minimal (trivial) example demonstrating the VPATH problem.
Either this i
Wow! Thanks so much, Henning! This is great. We'll put it in the docs
alongside the one for Linux/MacOSX. I had to comment out one more thing
before it would run properly, though--the "-djob-count" option,
something we put in on the Linux version to take advantage of dual
processors. It ch
Am 25.05.2009, 20:19 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp :
I'm copying the whole Makefile below in case anyone would like to try it
on Windows. The tarball of the Stamitz symphony source files is
available here:
http://music2.louisiana.edu/Gratis/
Jon,
here is a changed version of your makefile,
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
I've made some progress. When I try to run "make score" on Windows
XP,
As it stands, the Makefile doesn't work with Windows. For
documentation purposes I strongly suggest to cook up a special
Windows Makefile with the same functionality.
Yes, this will be my new strat
>> I've made some progress. When I try to run "make score" on Windows
>> XP,
As it stands, the Makefile doesn't work with Windows. For
documentation purposes I strongly suggest to cook up a special
Windows Makefile with the same functionality.
>>%.pdf %.midi: %.ly
>> $(LILY_CMD) $<; \
>> I don't know what
>> $(LILY_CMD) $<; \
>> means,
This calls lilypond -- or rather the contents of the variable LILY_CMD
-- with the prerequisite (the *.ly file) as the argument.
>> but the two if statements seem to check if there are any pdf or
>> midi files around and then move them to
Am 25.05.2009, 00:21 Uhr, schrieb Henning Plumeyer :
I don't know what
$(LILY_CMD) $<; \
means, but the two if statements seem to check if there are any pdf or
midi files around and then move them to their directories.
On Windows this can be achieved as follows:
if exist *.pdf
Am 23.05.2009, 04:41 Uhr, schrieb Jonathan Kulp :
I've made some progress. When I try to run "make score" on Windows XP,
I get the following message:
make: *** No rule to make target `stamitz.ly', needed by
`stamitz.pdf'. Stop.
I get no such message when I run it on Linux. Right now
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2009/5/22 Jonathan Kulp :
Initial efforts are fruitless. I installed GNUMake on the XP partition, but
when I type the command "make" in the dos shell, it says there's no such
program. I tried "Make" and "make.exe" as well with the same results. I
have no idea what to
2009/5/22 Jonathan Kulp :
> Initial efforts are fruitless. I installed GNUMake on the XP partition, but
> when I type the command "make" in the dos shell, it says there's no such
> program. I tried "Make" and "make.exe" as well with the same results. I
> have no idea what to try next because the
Are you just talking about the if .. then conditional part? First I'll try
just commenting that whole thing out and see if it will compile, then I'll
try to figure out how to deliver the output to the right directories.
Thanks Ian,
Jon.
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 8:19 AM, Ian Hulin wrote:
> Jon,
Jon,
You've put Linux-style bash shell commands to interpret this rule to
differentiate what to do for the midi and pf files
if ...
don't forget that on Windows you're dealing with the cmd command-line
interpreter rather than bash, so you may need to do a Windows-variant
version of this rule.
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
Now, the full score compiles if I change the score target to this:
score:
$(LILY_CMD) Scores/$(piece).ly
So it looks like the Windows environment doesn't know how to deal with
the pattern rule defined at the top of the Makefile.
I'm encouraged that it's pre
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
I would agree with that.
Sometimes stuff is in My Documents, which has a space.
Carl
I've made some progress. When I try to run "make score" on Windows XP,
I get the following message:
make: *** No rule to make target `stamitz.ly', needed by
`stamitz.pdf'. St
On 5/22/09 8:41 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
>>
>> I would agree with that.
>>
>> Sometimes stuff is in My Documents, which has a space.
>>
>> Carl
>>
>
> I've made some progress. When I try to run "make score" on Windows XP,
> I get the following message:
>
>
On 5/22/09 5:33 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 5/22/09 3:48 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
>>
>>> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
You may want to make sure you have the right make:
which make
make --version
>>> GNU Make 3.81
>>>
>>> That'
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 5/22/09 3:48 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
You may want to make sure you have the right make:
which make
make --version
GNU Make 3.81
That's the same version number I have on Linux.
Jon
Do you have spaces in your document path? Someti
On 5/22/09 3:48 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> You may want to make sure you have the right make:
>>
>> which make
>>
>> make --version
>>
>
> GNU Make 3.81
>
> That's the same version number I have on Linux.
>
> Jon
>
Do you have spaces in your document pat
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
You may want to make sure you have the right make:
which make
make --version
GNU Make 3.81
That's the same version number I have on Linux.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-devel mailing lis
On 5/22/09 3:18 PM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>> Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>>> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
> This is a good idea, Carl. I wouldn't mind trying it myself. My son's
> laptop has XP on one partition but I don't know if I'll be able to get
> on there and tr
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
This is a good idea, Carl. I wouldn't mind trying it myself. My son's
laptop has XP on one partition but I don't know if I'll be able to get
on there and try this out. I'd be a good one to try it, though,
because
I'm totally
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
This is a good idea, Carl. I wouldn't mind trying it myself. My son's
laptop has XP on one partition but I don't know if I'll be able to get
on there and try this out. I'd be a good one to try it, though,
because
I'm totally clueless on Windows, a
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
This is a good idea, Carl. I wouldn't mind trying it myself. My son's
laptop has XP on one partition but I don't know if I'll be able to get
on there and try this out. I'd be a good one to try it, though, because
I'm totally clueless on Windows, and if I can get it worki
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
But aren't the commands run from the Makefile dependent on something
like Cygwin? I honestly don't know, I'm just wondering.
Windows has a built in command shell, and at least from my cursory overview
GNU Make knows how to work with it.
I think that all of the lilypon
On 5/22/09 7:36 AM, "Jonathan Kulp" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/21/09 4:16 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
>>
>>> Graham Percival a écrit :
Also, I'm slightly leery about how the Makefile stuff would be
introduced -- it should be obvious that this only works on lin
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
On 5/21/09 4:16 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
Graham Percival a écrit :
Also, I'm slightly leery about how the Makefile stuff would be
introduced -- it should be obvious that this only works on linux
and osx (by default), and would require a lot of additional
software
On 5/21/09 4:16 PM, "John Mandereau" wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
>> Also, I'm slightly leery about how the Makefile stuff would be
>> introduced -- it should be obvious that this only works on linux
>> and osx (by default), and would require a lot of additional
>> software to run on win
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 12:16:41AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Graham Percival a écrit :
>> Also, I'm slightly leery about how the Makefile stuff would be
>> introduced -- it should be obvious that this only works on linux
>> and osx (by default), and would require a lot of additional
>> softwar
Graham Percival a écrit :
Also, I'm slightly leery about how the Makefile stuff would be
introduced -- it should be obvious that this only works on linux
and osx (by default), and would require a lot of additional
software to run on window.
A default Cygwin installation provides all you need f
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:00:01PM -0500, Jonathan Kulp wrote:
> I see that there's a TODO in the "working.itely" file that says the
> "Score and Parts" section needs rewriting or scrapping. Any objection
> if I take a stab at rewriting this and working in a section on
> Makefiles?
No objec
Graham, Trevor,
I see that there's a TODO in the "working.itely" file that says the
"Score and Parts" section needs rewriting or scrapping. Any objection
if I take a stab at rewriting this and working in a section on
Makefiles? It might be a good spot for a makefile example, especially
cons
39 matches
Mail list logo
