> see
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/246041
>
> for an even less hacky install.
Very nice. The renaming is a good thing IMHO.
> I had a brief look at the doc of how the fonts are created. You may
> want to look into learning MetaFont - it matches pretty well how you
> created the fonts,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
>>> I also added a tracker issue for this problem a few days ago:
>>
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> can you have a look at
>>
>> http://codereview.appspot.com/248041
>>
>> I'll add some code next to make unify the two desgn size lists, which
>> shoul
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
>> If I am understanding correctly, the problem is that no workaround for
>> loading Gonville was added to scm/font.scm (search for
>> feta-alphabet-size-vector).
>>
>> I also added a
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:40 PM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> If I am understanding correctly, the problem is that no workaround for
> loading Gonville was added to scm/font.scm (search for
> feta-alphabet-size-vector).
>
> I also added a tracker issue for this problem a few days ago:
Hi Patrick,
ca
Hello Simon,
see
http://codereview.appspot.com/246041
for an even less hacky install.
As you note, the alphabet remains tricky. The current method of
loading the alphabet fonts is rather hacky (for the text fonts, we use
the PFB version rather than the OTF one), so we should first fix that
b
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Simon Tatham wrote:
>>> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
>>> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
>>>
>>> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gon
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Simon Tatham wrote:
>> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
>> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
>>
>> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved
>> by making the final flag 16th (both
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
> have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
>
> Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved
> by making the final flag 16th (both up and down) and higher note
>
[on a tangent]
I went over to the gonville page, and I like the way it looks, and
have to concur that we made Feta (perhaps overly) ornate.
Just a small comment on the flags: I think gonville could be improved
by making the final flag 16th (both up and down) and higher note
values slightly smalle
James wrote:
[Gonville]
> The instructions to use this replacement for the feta font are simple (if
> rudimentary), but what I wanted to check is that as of 2.13.x there still is
> not a simple function along the lines of what is documented in the Notation
> Reference
>
> Such as #'(font.name.
Hello,
I hope this is the right list to ask this question on.
I am currently helping Graham with Doc edits and am looking at adding into
them somewhere the instructions for Windows/Mac OS and *NIX for the music font
Gonville (for those that don't know
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatha
11 matches
Mail list logo
