I've uploaded a new patch set with graphical back in as a property
and assigned to the instrument-specific-markup interface.
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/
___
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/list
On 2010/08/18 21:46:02, Neil Puttock wrote:
On 2010/08/15 04:10:36, Carl wrote:
> I tested, and verified that I don't need it, but why? I thought
that we had
> checks to issue a warning if an undefined property was used. Is
that only for
> context properties?
It depends on whether you
On 2010/08/15 04:10:36, Carl wrote:
I tested, and verified that I don't need it, but why? I thought that
we had
checks to issue a warning if an undefined property was used. Is that
only for
context properties?
It depends on whether you think users are likely to do this (where you'd
also
On 8/17/10 9:15 PM, "Mike Solomon" wrote:
> Hey all,
> Looks a-ok to me: I don't have time to run the regtests now (still
> traveling, no battery...), but if they don't break, feel free to push!
regtests are fine, so I'll go ahead and push, and then finish the
documentation.
Thanks,
Car
Hey all,
Looks a-ok to me: I don't have time to run the regtests now (still
traveling, no battery...), but if they don't break, feel free to push!
~Mike
On 8/15/10 12:10 AM, "carl.d.soren...@gmail.com"
wrote:
> OK, I fixed all these things, but I did have a question about why the
> grob pr
On 8/15/10 2:39 AM, "David Kastrup" wrote:
> carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
>
>> On 2010/08/14 19:47:59, Neil Puttock wrote:
>>> Since these are bound with defaults above, you don't need to use
>> chain-assoc-get
>>
>>> (radius size)
>>
>> Done. I forgot about how nifty the new interface i
carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
> On 2010/08/14 19:47:59, Neil Puttock wrote:
>> Since these are bound with defaults above, you don't need to use
> chain-assoc-get
>
>> (radius size)
>
> Done. I forgot about how nifty the new interface is that David made
> possible.
Actually, the niftiness is
OK, I fixed all these things, but I did have a question about why the
grob property didn't need to be defined.
Thanks,
Carl
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5#newcode414
scm/define-grob-pr
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5
File scm/define-grob-properties.scm (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/1946043/diff/1/5#newcode414
scm/define-grob-properties.scm:414: (graphical ,boolean? "Display in
graphical, rather than textual, form.")
don't need this
http://codereview.ap
Reviewers: MikeSol,
Message:
Here's a patch that changes the syntax for woodwind-diagram markups so
that size, thickness, and graphic become part of the properties, rather
than part of the arguments to the markup call.
It's your code, Mike, so I don't want to push it without your
permission, but
10 matches
Mail list logo
