> If you are writing the html yourself, then why do you want a cgi
> call?
I'm not necessarily writing the html myself.
A CGI interface is useful for the same use cases that mathtex enables
with LaTeX.
> It doesn't make any sense to regenerate the output every time
> somebody looks at the webpage
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:50:43PM +0900, Ichiro Watanabe wrote:
> > For an individual person, lilypond-book can already process html
> > files, so there is nothing extra needed.
>
> My goal is to embed the lilypond source in HTML source. Something like this
>
>
>
> Example
>
>
> Th
> For an individual person, lilypond-book can already process html
> files, so there is nothing extra needed.
Thank you.
I think I didn't explain myself very well.
My goal is to embed the lilypond source in HTML source. Something like this
Example
This is my new song:
My under
For an individual person, lilypond-book can already process html
files, so there is nothing extra needed.
If you want to have it for a multi-user situation like a wiki,
then search for "lilypond wiki" or "mediawiki" or similar terms on
the mailist; it has been discussed before. Be warned that the
Hi there,
I am new to lilypond.
I am wondering if there exists an interface like mathtex, for lilypond.
For those who don't know mathtex, it's a way of embedding rendered TeX
images directly and easily in an HTML page (and therefore in wikis, in
blogs etc), through a relatively simple CGI service.
