On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:50:43PM +0900, Ichiro Watanabe wrote:
> > For an individual person, lilypond-book can already process html
> > files, so there is nothing extra needed.
>
> My goal is to embed the lilypond source in HTML source. Something like this
>
> <html>
> <head>
> <title>Example</title>
> </head>
> <body>
> This is my new song: <img
> src="localorpublic/cgi-bin/lilypondmagic.cgi?\relative c { \clef bass
> c d e c }">
> </body>
> </html>
If you are writing the html yourself, then why do you want a cgi
call? You get the desired output by running lilypond-book with
the [verbose] option.
It doesn't make any sense to regenerate the output every time
somebody looks at the webpage.
> > If you want to have it for a multi-user situation like a wiki,
> > then search for "lilypond wiki" or "mediawiki" or similar terms on
> > the mailist; it has been discussed before.
>
> This is slightly off-topic, but for everyone's benefit, this is what I
> know about the MediaWiki situation.
If you don't want a multi-user situation, then I don't see the
point of a cgi script...?
> This works fine for private (intranet) wikis and for public wikis that
> are not notable enough to be subject to DoS attacks.
Yes, which is why I suggested that you look into "safe mode".
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
