On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:07 PM, Carl Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 5/27/10 11:55 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
>
>> Nobody should be building the regtests without installing git.
>> Developers need git. Bug Squad people should look at the official
>> online regtests.
>
> For developers, the primary inf
On 5/27/10 11:55 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Valentin Villenave
> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
>> wrote:
>>
>> Actually, I began writing CG doc for regtests, and tried to put myself
>> in the shoes of an hypothetical contribu
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> Nobody should be building the regtests without installing git.
> Developers need git. Bug Squad people should look at the official
> online regtests.
Granted.
> No, because
> 1) the CG is not written sequentially
> 2) the CG is not suppo
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Valentin Villenave
wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
> wrote:
>> We do *not* want
>> info about download a tarball as the first section in CG 2. In fact,
>> we don't want it anywhere in CG 2 at all. If people are desperate for
>> this, it
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Graham Percival
wrote:
> What the bloody mao have you been smoking, Valentin?
Hi Graham,
nice to see you too :)
> We do *not* want
> info about download a tarball as the first section in CG 2. In fact,
> we don't want it anywhere in CG 2 at all. If people are d
What the bloody mao have you been smoking, Valentin? We do *not* want
info about download a tarball as the first section in CG 2. In fact,
we don't want it anywhere in CG 2 at all. If people are desperate for
this, it's in CG 3.3.
More generally, we don't need people randomly changing the "fini
