Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-05-03 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Erik Sandberg writes: > The reason I haven't added it in, is that I don't fully understand the > difference between regression and critical. Yes, maybe you're right. A regression is a reason for a bug to be (release-) critical. > So: What is the real difference? When a bug is considered > regr

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-05-03 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > The reason I haven't added it in, is that I don't fully understand the > difference between regression and critical. > > Regression tests are, afaicu, important examples that show aspects of what > lilypond's output should look like. And there is already an official

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-05-03 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 26 April 2004 16.32, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > > About priority: I like your suggestion, but I would like to add the > > current "important" between normal and regression (& I realise that the > > currently "critical" bugs should be placed there as well). Just so we > > have two levels o

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-26 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Erik Sandberg writes: > My thought with the initial naming was to create something minimal Yes, minimal is good. > About priority: I like your suggestion, but I would like to add the current > "important" between normal and regression (& I realise that the currently > "critical" bugs should be

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-26 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Friday 23 April 2004 11.03, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > May I suggest to adopt a bit more bugzilla like naming (eg, > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bug_status.html), possibly with adaptation, > it does not need to be as full blown, ie something like: > > priority (high to low): crash/critical, regr

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-23 Thread Pedro Kroger
* Werner LEMBERG ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > Finally it's uploaded. All bugs lie in one big directory; this will > > probably be changed to something better as soon as we can see > > exactly what we need. > > What's the name of this bug-repository? I've missed this somehow. lily-bugs i.e.

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-23 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Finally it's uploaded. All bugs lie in one big directory; this will > probably be changed to something better as soon as we can see > exactly what we need. What's the name of this bug-repository? I've missed this somehow. Werner ___ Lilypond-

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-23 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Erik Sandberg writes: > Finally it's uploaded. > I wrote a draft to a readme of how its organised now: That's grand! > Properties include: > crash: The bug causes lilypond to abort with exit code nonzero. > future: The bug is known and will not be fixed in a near future. > critical: The bug sho

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-22 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Thursday 22 April 2004 07.25, Edward Sanford Sutton, III wrote: > On Wednesday April 21 2004 14:58, Erik Sandberg wrote: > > I would however be the only one who > > actually removes the files from the repository; this because I think it's > > a good idea that someone always should double-check t

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-22 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Erik Sandberg wrote: On Wednesday 21 April 2004 17.47, Mats Bengtsson wrote: Great! I suggest to add some information on the procedures also, unless you want to be the only one to handle these files. If I find a bug, could I just upload the file to CVS (I have CVS access) or should I send it to

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-21 Thread Edward Sanford Sutton, III
On Wednesday April 21 2004 14:58, Erik Sandberg wrote: > I would however be the only one who > actually removes the files from the repository; this because I think it's a > good idea that someone always should double-check that the bug really was > fixed. I hope that unverifiable bugs have a remov

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 17.47, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > Great! > > I suggest to add some information on the procedures also, unless you > want to be the only one to handle these files. If I find a bug, could > I just upload the file to CVS (I have CVS access) or should I send it to > bug-lilypond

Re: Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-21 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Great! I suggest to add some information on the procedures also, unless you want to be the only one to handle these files. If I find a bug, could I just upload the file to CVS (I have CVS access) or should I send it to bug-lilypond first, or ...? Same goes for status changes, when somebody with CV

Bug repository UPLOADED!

2004-04-21 Thread Erik Sandberg
Hi, Finally it's uploaded. All bugs lie in one big directory; this will probably be changed to something better as soon as we can see exactly what we need. I wrote a draft to a readme of how its organised now: Lilypond Bug Repository Each bug report should have the following form: 1. Each bug