Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-27 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Ed Baskerville wrote: On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Have a look at Lilypond.app, which registers itself as a handler for the textedit:// protocol. You could launch Preview on 10.3, and use the same mechanism there. I certainly could. That just precludes the possibil

Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-26 Thread Ed Baskerville
On Jul 26, 2005, at 4:28 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: Have a look at Lilypond.app, which registers itself as a handler for the textedit:// protocol. You could launch Preview on 10.3, and use the same mechanism there. I certainly could. That just precludes the possibility of "almost live" p

Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Ed Baskerville wrote: Specifically, QTKit and PDFKit (inside Quartz)--they're separate from the standard AppKit/Foundation frameworks. On second glance, it looks like the wrappers are very easy to generate, especially since I don't think there are any ObjC protocols to wrap. The fact that

Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-26 Thread Ed Baskerville
Specifically, QTKit and PDFKit (inside Quartz)--they're separate from the standard AppKit/Foundation frameworks. On second glance, it looks like the wrappers are very easy to generate, especially since I don't think there are any ObjC protocols to wrap. The fact that I use QTKit and PDFKit

Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Ed Baskerville wrote: LilyPond.app has been my work, but I don't mind if someone else steps to continue improveming and developing it. However, I do oppose to Objective-C as development language. We already have too many languages (C++, Python, Scheme and bits of C)- and I see a maintenanc

Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-26 Thread Ed Baskerville
LilyPond.app has been my work, but I don't mind if someone else steps to continue improveming and developing it. However, I do oppose to Objective-C as development language. We already have too many languages (C++, Python, Scheme and bits of C)- and I see a maintenance problem with adding a

Re: Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-26 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
Ed Baskerville wrote: So, first, the main question: is there interest in combining the existing LilyPond.app with some of the features and approaches of LilyPad? If there is interest, I'd be happy to take the reins on OS X GUI development--it's what I know best. If somebody else is already

Bringing LilyPad into LilyPond

2005-07-23 Thread Ed Baskerville
Hi all, As you've probably seen from my message to the user list, I've released a (rather feature-poor) preview of LilyPad, an integrated editor/previewer for LilyPond on Mac OS X. First, an apology to the LilyPond icon designer: I stole it. But that theft was meant not as an act of aggre