>> Nacho, instead of the previously proposed alias, please use the
>> better name `lilypond-bugs.gnu.org'! And please tell us as soon as
>> you are done.
>
> Before we do 5 proposals in a row: shouldn't we rather try matching the
> name of our bug reporting list and aim for bug-lilypond.gnu.org?
Werner LEMBERG writes:
> [CCing Nacho]
>
>> Nacho has included bugs.lilypond.gnu.org as an alias on the apache
>> configuration and he has been asked to set this up as a DNS name.
>
> Well, `bugs.lilypond.gnu.org' apparently doesn't work.
>
>> I've not yet heard back from him, so don't know if th
[CCing Nacho]
> Nacho has included bugs.lilypond.gnu.org as an alias on the apache
> configuration and he has been asked to set this up as a DNS name.
Well, `bugs.lilypond.gnu.org' apparently doesn't work.
> I've not yet heard back from him, so don't know if this has been
> done.
It seems not
Federico Bruni wrote Wednesday, September 02, 2015 4:29 AM
> Il giorno dom 30 ago 2015 alle 17:57, Trevor Daniels
> ha scritto:
>> I've not heard anything from Federico or Josiah for over a week, so
>> I've no idea what state Allura at Savannah is in. I suggest we wait
>> a few days for news
- Original Message -
From: "josiah oberholtzer"
To: "Federico Bruni" ; "Trevor Daniels"
Cc: "Lilypond bug list" ; "lilypond-devel"
Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2015 5:19 AM
Subject: Re: Allura at SF is ready
Hi all,
Sorry fo
Hi all,
Sorry for being out of touch - other obligations caught up with me.
I'm not sure how to proceed on the bugs.lilypond.org side. The Allura
server there is operational (visit the site to see), but - as Federico
points out - we don't have working HTTPS connections.
It looks like the GNU cer
Il giorno dom 30 ago 2015 alle 17:57, Trevor Daniels
ha scritto:
I've not heard anything from Federico or Josiah for over a week, so
I've no idea what state Allura at Savannah is in. I suggest we wait
a few days for news before inviting devs to join at SF, in case the
Savannah system comes on
James Lowe wrote Monday, August 31, 2015 9:29 AM
> @Trevor
>
> Assuming that you eventually start the migration, I assume you'll tell
> the group and we'd best hold off updating SF until it is completed (so
> that we don't interfere with the migration)?
Yes, that would be sensible. It should
Trevor,
On 30/08/15 16:57, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> James wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 4:22 PM
>
>> I've 'synced' my list of Patches I've been keeping track of
>> manually with the issues list now.
>>
>> Is this set of issues going to be the one we migrate to the 'new'
>> non-SF system?
>>
>
James wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 4:22 PM
> I've 'synced' my list of Patches I've been keeping track of manually
> with the issues list now.
>
> Is this set of issues going to be the one we migrate to the 'new' non-SF
> system?
>
> I.e. do we now treat this as a live system?
Yes. When we mi
Hello Trevor,
On 30/08/15 15:00, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> James, you wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:47 PM
>
>> Some comments if I may be so bold.
> Of course - most welcome!
>
>> 1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
>> hand side panel) for each of the Patch stat
James, you wrote Sunday, August 30, 2015 1:47 PM
> Some comments if I may be so bold.
Of course - most welcome!
> 1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
> hand side panel) for each of the Patch states
>
> New
> Review
> Countdown
> Push
Presumably you'd like t
Hello Trevor,
Some comments if I may be so bold.
1. I think it would be useful to have 'Searches' (defined on that left
hand side panel) for each of the Patch states
New
Review
Countdown
Push
At the moment we have 'Review' only.
The 'Fixed' search
2. It seems that the 'Needs' field is mandato
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 11:12 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> David Kastrup wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:34 AM
>>
>>> Sounds more like a job for a script.
>>
>> It would be tricky. The script would need to find all
>> issues with a GC reference by a search, look
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> David Kastrup wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:34 AM
>
>
>> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>>
>>> What doesn't work is a link to a specific comment. They take you
>>> back to the start of the issue, not the comment. But as the old
>>> comments are all linear it is possib
2015-08-29 11:30 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels :
>
> Pál, you wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 8:21 AM
>>
>> I also noted that explicit links like
>> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2249
>> are not converted. Again, not a big problem, just some
>> inconvenience in reading old issues.
David Kastrup wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 10:34 AM
> "Trevor Daniels" writes:
>
>> What doesn't work is a link to a specific comment. They take you
>> back to the start of the issue, not the comment. But as the old
>> comments are all linear it is possible to count down to find the
>> spe
"Trevor Daniels" writes:
> Pál, you wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 8:21 AM
>>
>> 2015-08-28 21:32 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels :
>>>
>>> There is a link field available in every comment to cut and
>>> paste in order to refer to it from elsewhere, including other
>>> issues, when threading doesn't me
Pál, you wrote Saturday, August 29, 2015 8:21 AM
>
> 2015-08-28 21:32 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels :
>>
>> There is a link field available in every comment to cut and
>> paste in order to refer to it from elsewhere, including other
>> issues, when threading doesn't meet the need.
>
> Yes; so it will w
Am 28.08.2015 um 17:14 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
The migration of the tracker from GC to Allura at SF has gone well.
Very good! Thank you.
Attachments are present and searches work (in the Allura style, which takes
some getting used to, but is pretty comprehensive.) I've set up some common
Benkő Pál wrote Friday, August 28, 2015 8:01 PM
>> The migration of the tracker from GC to Allura at SF has gone well.
>> Attachments are present and searches work (in the Allura style, which takes
>> some getting used to, but is pretty comprehensive.) I've set up some common
>> searches to
> The migration of the tracker from GC to Allura at SF has gone well.
> Attachments are present and searches work (in the Allura style, which takes
> some getting used to, but is pretty comprehensive.) I've set up some common
> searches to make things easier. You can view it here to inspect a
The migration of the tracker from GC to Allura at SF has gone well.
Attachments are present and searches work (in the Allura style, which takes
some getting used to, but is pretty comprehensive.) I've set up some common
searches to make things easier. You can view it here to inspect and play
23 matches
Mail list logo
