On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 10:04 PM Valentin Villenave
wrote:
>
> On 4/26/20, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I can host this script somewhere else so it can be referenced in the CG,
> > but I don't think there optimizing our C++ code is a domain for
> > beginners.
>
> I may be off the mark here, but
On 4/26/20, hanw...@gmail.com wrote:
> I can host this script somewhere else so it can be referenced in the CG,
> but I don't think there optimizing our C++ code is a domain for
> beginners.
I may be off the mark here, but what about adding your speed test into
the standard regression test suite
On 2020/04/25 22:05:26, dak wrote:
> On 2020/04/25 17:07:17, hahnjo wrote:
> > I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are
> > already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation
> at
> > all.
>
> How about approaching this in a different
On 2020/04/25 22:05:26, dak wrote:
> On 2020/04/25 17:07:17, hahnjo wrote:
> > I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are
> > already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation
> at
> > all.
>
> How about approaching this in a different
On 2020/04/25 17:07:17, hahnjo wrote:
> I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are
> already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation at
> all.
How about approaching this in a different manner then? Adding
instructions to the CG about
Reviewers: hahnjo,
Message:
sure.
Description:
Add a script for running timing benchmarks
Please review this at https://codereview.appspot.com/545950043/
Affected files (+97, -0 lines):
A scripts/auxiliar/benchmark.py
Index: scripts/auxiliar/benchmark.py
diff --git a/scripts/auxiliar/benchm
I strongly object to adding more random scripts to the source tree.
There are already far too many unmaintained in scripts/auxiliar/ with no
documentation at all.
https://codereview.appspot.com/545950043/
